Soulgalore Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 The A in 'A Little Togetherness' looks strangely 'out of line' to me. https://www.ebay.com/itm/NM-45-Younghearts-A-Little-Togetherness-CANTERBURY-Original-Styrene-RARE/132902038749?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Shufflin Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 looks odd to me, the Y is also too near the centre? but I'm no expert Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Baz1 Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 Never seen one totally off centre like that looks dodgy t me Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Chalky Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 Its obviously printed off centre but that could just be a fault at printing or pressing, hard to say without full details, run out etc Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Tony A Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 That A looks a bit dodgy as well. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 7 minutes ago, Tony A said: That A looks a bit dodgy as well. The "A" is dodgy but I think the record is ok. The Monarch delta number puts it at early 1967. https://www.discogs.com/The-Younghearts-Little-Togetherness-Beginning-Of-The-End/release/4918844 3 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Woodbutcher Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 Looks fine to these eyes , MR stamp clearly visible on the flip side , the "A" looks a little odd but my guess is that the label was 'updated' for the repress as what looks like a bigger mistake was leaving it off on the original run. The repress image on Discogs and elsewhere also show a slightly 'faded' "A" so I'd say that the label printers "overprinted" the "A" onto the labels rather than scrap the screen and redo the whole job. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Chalky Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 21 minutes ago, WoodButcher said: Looks fine to these eyes , MR stamp clearly visible on the flip side , the "A" looks a little odd but my guess is that the label was 'updated' for the repress as what looks like a bigger mistake was leaving it off on the original run. The repress image on Discogs and elsewhere also show a slightly 'faded' "A" so I'd say that the label printers "overprinted" the "A" onto the labels rather than scrap the screen and redo the whole job. I didn't see the other photos But now I have it looks ok with that delta number etc. 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Woodbutcher Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 17 minutes ago, chalky said: I didn't see the other photos But now I have it looks ok with that delta number etc. No worries Karl , it's Friday and I'm sure you have better things to do ... see you in three weeks sir ... 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!