Photo rules on Discogs

[Platters 81 72]

 

theres no fool like an old fool.....me........read the following

from me

not happy....the ps you sent had a sticker mark over dustys face.....you used a stock photo of a perfect one..unforgiveable...ill be giving you negative feedback and warn other Soul Source members of your unacceptable sharp business practice

 

from Max Rees

Firstly this items sleeve was given a g+ grading which is a red flag for us all that the sleeve will be be far from perfect. Also it is clearly stated in the description that RESSIDUE stains are evident It is part of my terms that all my records are guarenteed if returned immediately, This message is the first I have heard after some considerable time. Furthermore it’s true to say that most photos on Discogs are perfect examples usually submitted by someone else not me Personally I feel obtaining this extremely rare record with a perfect picture sleeve at that price is highly and overly optimistic

Print

 

from me

 

i looked at the photo and thought ............thats not too bad............in my experience most sales photos are not submitted by someone else....40 years of collecting 45s and ive been ripped off.....ah well..............i did e mail a few days ago btw

 

Edited October 10, 2020 by Platters 81

[Wiggyflat 704]

How can you see a photo of the item unless he emailed it to you.All discogs photos are stock photos uploaded to show you what sleeve it should be.Not the actual item.Have you asked for a refund and been refused ? 

[Woodbutcher 2,003]

Max is one of the most trustworthy and likeable people on this planet and a highly respected DJ on the "black music" scene ... not to mention being one of my oldest friends , his reputation is second to none.

He has had some very serious health issues in the recent past which has affected his Discogs activity , but he is well on the way to recovery.

I would suggest against a continued attack on here as Max is not here to defend himself .

[Jkpnefc 174]

I thought everyone who buys off discogs realised that the photos used are stock .That is why there is a description column for sleeve grading .If I bought one that said G+ I wouldn't be expecting anything more than that

[Platters 81 72]

i sent this message to Max Rees

 

i was unaware that you cant change the photo from the stock one on the listing.....sincere apologiesl

[Mike 5,595]

Just now, Platters 81 said:

i sent this message to Max Rees

 

i was unaware that you cant change the photo from the stock one on the listing.....sincere apologiesl

 

 

good to hear this is sorted

do you want this post removed or title edited?

[Platters 81 72]

change the title to"photo rules on discogs" thanks Mike

[Platters 81 72]

a friend who sells on discogs sent this

You can only sell a record on Discogs if it’s on their database, and there’s usually a photo with the entry. You can add a record if it’s not on the database, or add a photo to an entry that doesn’t have one. The main thing is to be sure you pick the exact version when there’s more than one