jimmyw Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Hi, can anybody tell me if the Butlers "Laugh Laugh" on Lost Nite is a reissue, I know a lot of the records on this label are reissues. Cheers Jimmyw Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Steve Edgar Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Hi, can anybody tell me if the Butlers "Laugh Laugh" on Lost Nite is a reissue, I know a lot of the records on this label are reissues. Cheers Jimmyw there is stuff like Lee Andrews "Cold grey dawn" and "Cant Get along without You" that only came out on Lost Nite. But Butlers first came out on Red then Blue text Phila lable as far as i know? steve Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Julianb Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Hi, can anybody tell me if the Butlers "Laugh Laugh" on Lost Nite is a reissue, I know a lot of the records on this label are reissues. Cheers Jimmyw Got it on Phila 1836 somewhere - think it's the original version. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
jimmyw Posted November 7, 2008 Author Share Posted November 7, 2008 there is stuff like Lee Andrews "Cold grey dawn" and "Cant Get along without You" that only came out on Lost Nite. But Butlers first came out on Red then Blue text Phila lable as far as i know? steve Hi Steve, thanks, I know that there were a couple of local issues on Lost Nite that's what made me ask given that it was issued on Phila. Jimmyw Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
jimmyw Posted November 7, 2008 Author Share Posted November 7, 2008 Got it on Phila 1836 somewhere - think it's the original version. Thanks Julian. Jimmyw Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Modernsoulsucks Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Watch out for Frank Howard's version "Titter,titter,titter" on YENOT ROD Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Harry Crosby Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Watch out for Frank Howard's version "Titter,titter,titter" on YENOT ROD oooer missus Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Chalky Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Watch out for Frank Howard's version "Titter,titter,titter" on YENOT ROD Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Dave Pinch Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 there is stuff like Lee Andrews "Cold grey dawn" and "Cant Get along without You" that only came out on Lost Nite. But Butlers first came out on Red then Blue text Phila lable as far as i know? steve blue first and red second..........altho red is rarer Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Val (Chunky) Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 blue first and red second..........altho red is rarer I thought that the red was first and got withdrawn because it was misspelt the Bulters Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Chalky Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 I thought that the red was first and got withdrawn because it was misspelt the Bulters red is the first as far as I'm aware. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Prophonics 2029 Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 LOL The Bulters, didn't know that no wonder Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
paultp Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 I thought that the red was first and got withdrawn because it was misspelt the Bulters That's what I thought too, mine is red and spelt "Bulters" Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
boba Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 red is the first as far as I'm aware. evidence that red is first is that the PREVIOUS butlers record on Phila (it's jean wells backed by the butlers and charles earland, it's one number earlier) is red print. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
ChrisOD1964 Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 love it in my top 1,000 faves Defo. chris Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Dave Pinch Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 i do agree the easy option is to say that the red text copies were withdrawn because of the mispelt artist credit and then correct it on the blue copies.it sold very well in philadelphia so they probably let the red text copies out anyway. being a small set up they couldnt afford not to sell them. remember it came out on lost nite and also on the collectables. im just trying to keep an open mind on the first issue 2nd issue talk because some people assume the harder release is always the first issue and that aint right. all phil la copies are original anyway. dave Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
boba Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 i do agree the easy option is to say that the red text copies were withdrawn because of the mispelt artist credit and then correct it on the blue copies.it sold very well in philadelphia so they probably let the red text copies out anyway. being a small set up they couldnt afford not to sell them. remember it came out on lost nite and also on the collectables. im just trying to keep an open mind on the first issue 2nd issue talk because some people assume the harder release is always the first issue and that aint right. all phil la copies are original anyway. dave I agree with you that people (not always correctly) assume that the rarer release is the first. But also, the previous number on the label also came out only on red text. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Cover-up Posted November 10, 2008 Share Posted November 10, 2008 Was there not talk that the Lost Nite 45 is a different recording? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Prophonics 2029 Posted November 10, 2008 Share Posted November 10, 2008 (edited) Seems logical if the first was miss spelt to press it up on a blue copy so you could see the difference from a mile away without reading each record individually. So this theory would backup the possibility of the first press being red. Edited November 10, 2008 by Prophonics 2029 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest vinylvixen Posted November 10, 2008 Share Posted November 10, 2008 I thought that the red was first and got withdrawn because it was misspelt the Bulters I can't believe it's not Bulters....I've got the blue one Who cares - it's a great tune and should get played and played until we all get sick of it Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest in town Mikey Posted November 10, 2008 Share Posted November 10, 2008 It seems an odd one to bring out on a reissue label. Isnt the blue one a qualifier for Warren's Cheap As Chips night? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest vinylvixen Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 It seems an odd one to bring out on a reissue label. Isnt the blue one a qualifier for Warren's Cheap As Chips night? Probably - criminally underrated tune. Still gives me goosebumps every time I hear the intro and transports me back to a time when unaccompanied women weren't allowed in a public bar in Wigan I'll be playing it at Stafford Rangers in December xx Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
jimmyw Posted November 12, 2008 Author Share Posted November 12, 2008 Probably - criminally underrated tune. Still gives me goosebumps every time I hear the intro and transports me back to a time when unaccompanied women weren't allowed in a public bar in Wigan I'll be playing it at Stafford Rangers in December xx Couldn't agree more, an absolutely cracking tune Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!