Jump to content

Seano

Members
  • Posts

    821
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4
  • Feedback

    0%

Seano last won the day on March 22

Seano had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Seano

  • Birthday 26/08/1958

Contact Methods

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Banbury
  • Interests
    Soul, surfing, ICT/Apple and education.
  • Top Soul Sound
    I'm A Lonely Stranger, Arthur Conley

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Seano's Achievements

Long Time

Long Time (14/20)

  • 17 Years In
  • Problem Solver Rare
  • 15 Years In
  • Uber Dedicated Rare
  • Dedicated

Recent Badges

620

Reputation

2

Community Answers

  1. What a great little film, beautiful soundtrack and some dedicated diggers there. Thanks for sharing this.
  2. Not sure if this has been posted, couldn't see it by searching: Box set of Shrine 7" from Ace https://www.acerecords.co.uk/shrine-records-rare-soul-sides-washington-dc-1965-1967
  3. Interesting question. I do normally look at the posts specifically because the thread is about new releases. I'm interested in the unreleased older recordings as well as the newly recorded tracks. But I'm probably guilty of just going in and reading/listening more than reacting/commenting. I think that like @Twoshoes, whether I react tends to be driven by if I think I'll buy it, and if so I might leave a comment too. I don't really feel it's fair to the people recording and issuing these records to deliberately note that their record doesn't do it for me, as there will have been a huge amount of work and hope gone into it. I guess another reason I'd not normally leave a negative comment is that my reaction is normally very quick. I click play and it either 'gets me' or I just move on. Don't know about the rest of you here, but while the one that clicks with me tends to stay as one I like, there have been plenty of times when I initially thought a track wasn't that great, but hearing it again at different times I have found it grows on me.
  4. Great article. This was a performance that I absolutely loved, back in 1999 on Jools Holland.
  5. He did, 1972 on Koko. It'll be nice to add this new release to keep my copy company.
  6. Love the Tommy Tate, heard it quite a few years back, not sure where, but what a great record.
  7. Sad news. Covered In the Guardian too: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2024/feb/08/henry-fambrough-dead-spinners
  8. Just happened to notice that the label title on the actual record has Yvonne Baker's track as "I Need Love" instead of "You Need Love". Oops.
  9. This one arrived today from North Broad Street:
  10. What a fantastic read Dave, really interesting and I love the idea of hitting on a 'seam' and digging through. Love the photos too. I'm sure 'Tom' will be really chuffed that his late brother, 'Mal', is acknowledged and appreciated here as the source of a pretty stunning collection that will now live on beyond its home in that cellar.
  11. Here's the link to the HMRC guide on this: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/selling-online-and-paying-taxes/selling-online-and-paying-taxes-information-sheet?&utm_source=t.co_hmrcgovuk&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=online_sellers It's not really all that helpful I feel. Lots of "If this is you then you may / may not be likely to be liable for tax"; no real clarity. But I got involved with a broad thread on Twitter (yeah, I know, X) about this and I'd be interested if people feel this is a fair summary of what the guidance seems to say: 1. If you are selling your personal possessions, and doing it as a one off thing, you're 'probably' not liable for tax. 2. If you buy things for the purpose of selling them, then you are probably liable for tax. 3. If the income (not profit; income) that you turn over by selling online exceeds £1,000, you 'may' be liable for tax. 4. If your online selling income is below £1,000, then you 'may' not be liable for tax. To be honest, I think it's all going to become part of the huge data set the government seem bent on developing. Palantir are taking on all of our NHS data (whole different topic of course). The government are legislating to have access to all the bank details for anyone receiving benefits of any kind, including pensions. All the bank details; not just how much you get via a specific benefit. And all of this online selling platform financial data could well be yet another area they feel they can use huge tech companies and/or AI to dig into and find unexpected uses for in the future, tax being just one of them.
  12. Seems it is the same copy that Kenny Burrell played when Banbury Soul Club was held at the North Newington sports clubhouse. @Eddie Hubbard holding it in the photo from November 2005.


×
×
  • Create New...