Ady Croasdell

I remember you referring to that, if anyone can de-archive it I'd love to see it. Thanks

I thought so, I tried to get the alternative one which I play out on the Chess 7s but they didn't use it

Thanks Andy, the Maxine's should have been corrected by 312 I'll check on them

How about Chuck I Keep Forgettin'? Mick at work reckons one version stood out for him but it may have been a good stereo. Anyone know of any recorded differences?

Brilliant, when I've got an afternoon and some dubs I'll tackle these though I'm not sure which Terry Callier LP you mean. Any more for any more?

Possible though I think someone above on this thread had a 149 kiss but we do need it witnessed on a real record and matrixes quoted, not just YouTube!

We used the same version as we had issued in 1994 on our Platters CD but a mono tape, so they sent us two different tapes both the longer version. It must have been edited and remixed for release unless anyone has a copy of the longer version which also has another chorus before the inst break too. I don't think the tempo's different but it's a different brass mix as the bari sax doesn't come in on the second "always love you" as it does on the 45. You can have the extra 20 seconds for free! We'll put the correct version out soon too. Thanks

That's the same version we've used all through and judging by that posted YouTube of 149 it does look like it plays kiss but verification of a copy with number details would confirm it.

Thanks Mick it does help but it ain't much clearer! Both 149 demo and 169 issue have the ride versions but have quite different markings 51411 and 54749. Has anyone got a 169 that plays kiss? It looks like 149 plays both versions though maybe its only demos that play ride? If they are variations could you put the markings up too please?

I'll compare that tomorrow

Just played a 169 and defo the Pye version. Quickest way to tell is the 149 original has him shout Yeah after his second Hand It Over. 54749-X W-169-B 50129-1c markings on this 169

Ha, still at it! It's a minefield. I'll check tomorrow.

Not by a pc all I can say is all the Kent versions are different to the uk Pye. Maybe we could dig our copies out and report on the versions? you can't always tell from a YouTube clip if they're using the sound from the record or not

Actually it's a very basic piano and congas demo we used but it does have charm and ideal for what I want. Ta

Good man in Lincs-that's exactly what I want to hear! I hope you're well Andy

Apparently. both released in 1964 february and October respectively. Anyone got a sound file of For All Time -flip of Beg Me to hand?

While we're on are there any other different Chuck Wand versions anyone's come across?

Actually it's a completely different vocal with lots of differences, same backing. Gointoagogo is spot on. I was comparing five different copies of the same version! At least we got it right first time.

Excelent thanks to everyone.

Great thanks, I'lll listen out for that

Just played the Kent single and that sounds the same too

I seem to remember people saying that a version we used was the wrong one. I've just gone through all our tapes and releases (except the Kent single) and they are all the same. Does anyone know anything else about this? Yours stumped!

Silly me it's the unissued September Jones Chink A Chank baby on our Pied Piper CD

I'm sure there are streams of consciousness and often contradictory but he would no doubt have argued his point well. I ain't got time to do it and don't feel strongly about it affecting his other great writing. He gave the scene a sense of self-worth, unity and pride in the early days. I'm not sure what you're referring to about Jagger but some of the Stones and Beatles, independently, looked up to him; which did little more than tickle him as he wasn't a fan of their music in the slightest

Thanks, not the version we have though.