Jump to content

briank

Members
  • Joined

  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by briank

  1. I think what they mean by compressed is an MP3 file vs a wave recording of a song.
  2. Hi, I have a nice NM demo copy mono/stereo. What is your offer?
  3. Look at what some DJ or Music Director stamped on my copy! It's more clear on other side.
  4. Hi, Is this the Bobby Adams you are looking for?
  5. What does that sell for?
  6. I don't know about the cost of chips there, but one on ebay is at $71.00 already!
  7. briank posted a post in a topic in Record Wants
    I have a NM clean copy but i can't find it right now. Is this the one you are looking for?
  8. I got a NM stock copy.
  9. Hi, Finally found it! NM promo copy mono/stereo. This copy does not have the flip side. Still interested?
  10. Yes, the vocals sound very similiar to me on the official release and the acetates. Glad they were enjoyed.
  11. These are two different acetates. Thanks for the input to all. I do not have the Argo 45 at all, so I could not compare. I could not find the cut on utube that is included above for some reason.
  12. thanks.
  13. Cheers.
  14. I just found another copy which confirms the previous statement by Prophonics2029. Attached is scan with lyric sheet This one is recorded at 45rpm.
  15. We do not know how much it predates it....Ramsey Lewis Argo 5481 release date is October 10, 1964 and Doug Banks is Argo 5483 which is after this. Mass production of 78s stopped around 1960 from what I've heard. I'm not in disagreement, but just wondering why they opted to record it at 78 rather than 45. Out of this collection of acetates of which there were over 100 this is the only one done this way. I have heard especially from 78 collectors that 78s sound better than 45s and maybe that's why this was done.
  16. Note...all the label says is: "Baby" and Hill and Range at the bottom. Another different thing is that it's recorded at 78 rpm!!! That's different for an acetate is it not?
  17. A strange thing is that it was recorded at 78 rpm...why would they do that? I do not think it is that old.
  18. I got another one that I need help on and I think is sounds like a soul record unlike the last one I asked about.
  19. Ok, thanks for your input. Hopefully someone else can shed some light on the song.
  20. No I did not. I thought it sounded more on the soul side than rock side. You did say it might be somethink like Belgium popcorn sound, right. That would not be a rock' record imo.
  21. Thanks for your input. Are there not many white northern soul 45s out there? I really did not think this sounded like rock to me. It does sound something like Gene Pitney might sing, no?
  22. I said the Upfronts because that is the only group I found that had used the same title as this one on the 45. I never heard the song before by anyone, so I don't know if it's the same or not. Ok, now you are telling me it does not sound like the Upfronts. Then who does it sound like? The other side is titled ''so much in love with you'' if that helps. I would put that up, but someone scratched it really bad so it can not be played.
  23. I'm having trouble adding the audio from the Cloud. Finally got it done.
  24. I need your help to determine if this record is the group Upfronts or someone else. Thanks for all input.

Advert via Google