Jump to content
Posted

can anyone supply me with scans of both and obvious differences to look out for

AS iVE NEVER HAD ONE IN MY HAND YET ..I DONT WANT TO SEND A SHITLOAD OF CASH FOR A BOOTLEG

IM ASSUMING ORIGINAL IS STYRENE AND BOOT VINYL??

CONFIRMATION NEEDED

tia GASHER

  • Replies 7
  • Views 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Featured Replies

can anyone supply me with scans of both and obvious differences to look out for

AS iVE NEVER HAD ONE IN MY HAND YET ..I DONT WANT TO SEND A SHITLOAD OF CASH FOR A BOOTLEG

IM ASSUMING ORIGINAL IS STYRENE AND BOOT VINYL??

CONFIRMATION NEEDED

tia GASHER

They're both vinyl, Gash'...

...but the boot looks more like it was pressed in Europe, it's more 'plastic' than vinyl (i.e. it looks like, say, a Belgian-pressed record from the 70s (although - and this is from memory - I don't think it'll be that that easy to tell from a scan what's a boot and what's not...)

I bought my original for a ton years ago, just two weeks before the boots appeared. I still believe that the guy who sold it to me was behind the boot in some way or, at least, knew that it was coming. Nearly 20 years on I could care less, of course! :thumbsup:

The Boot has a load of UK style copyright language / drivel :thumbsup: around the edge. The original does not.

yeh the boot has the allrights of the manufacturer stuff around the edge.has it got anti skate round the label as well

dave

I WAS RECENTLY TOLD THIS IS THE BOOT.

Dolly :thumbsup:

Edited by dollynormal1

Get involved with Soul Source

Advert via Google