a = age

b = collection

c = dj mates

So a + b + c = d

the higher the value of d = similar quotiant respect

You with me?

Now divide d by e

e being an owd c*nt, one not up on his Hot Box theorum and unable to kick it with the youngsters on the floor, even with the assistance of talc (f), which now just hinders matters.

So we have:

a + b + c divided by d without the assistance of e or f (f being once a positive factor, now a minus)

Which gives us the formula for being a deflated has been with feck all but their memories and bad knees as:

A + B + C divided by D - E + F

Edited March 18, 200916 yr by Barry

a = age

b = collection

c = dj mates

So a + b + c = d

the higher the value of d = similar quotiant respect

You with me?

Now divide d by e

e being an owd c*nt, one not up on his Hot Box theorum and unable to kick it with the youngsters on the floor, even with the assistance of talc (f), which now just hinders matters.

So we have:

a + b + c divided by d without the assistance of e or f (f being once a positive factor, now a minus)

Which gives us the formula for being a deflated has been with feck all but their memories and bad knees as:

A + B + C divided by D - E + F

Are you sure its not B+A+R+R+Y ?

Steve

Are you sure its not B+A+R+R+Y ?

Steve

Steve - the old 'Equations Game' is a good 'un - try it sometime - that was just a flash entry you know!?

(and I don't often give the old avatars a work out mate, that bast*rd was just for you)

a = age

b = collection

c = dj mates

So a + b + c = d

the higher the value of d = similar quotiant respect

You with me?

Now divide d by e

e being an owd c*nt, one not up on his Hot Box theorum and unable to kick it with the youngsters on the floor, even with the assistance of talc (f), which now just hinders matters.

So we have:

a + b + c divided by d without the assistance of e or f (f being once a positive factor, now a minus)

Which gives us the formula for being a deflated has been with feck all but their memories and bad knees as:

A + B + C divided by D - E + F

Don't know why I'm bothering ...but I believe your final equation to be incorrect...surely it would be..

A + B + C divided by D - (E + F)

Otherwise the value of F will have a positive, rather than a negative result on the final value.

Just like to see things done proper like.......

Don't know why I'm bothering ...but I believe your final equation to be incorrect...surely it would be..

A + B + C divided by D - (E + F)

Otherwise the value of F will have a positive, rather than a negative result on the final value.

Just like to see things done proper like.......

Mace, you're bang on mate, I got a little lost in there somewhere but thanks for ruining what could have been a very entertaining post mate.

Love

Barry

Mace, you're bang on mate, I got a little lost in there somewhere but thanks for ruining what could have been a very entertaining post mate.

Love

Barry

You're more than welcome Barry.

If its worth doing, it's worth doing right as me owd man used to say......

You're more than welcome Barry.

If its worth doing, it's worth doing right as me owd man used to say......

Shame he got it wrong with you though ay Mace?

a = age

b = collection

c = dj mates

So a + b + c = d

the higher the value of d = similar quotiant respect

You with me?

Now divide d by e

e being an owd c*nt, one not up on his Hot Box theorum and unable to kick it with the youngsters on the floor, even with the assistance of talc (f), which now just hinders matters.

So we have:

a + b + c divided by d without the assistance of e or f (f being once a positive factor, now a minus)

Which gives us the formula for being a deflated has been with feck all but their memories and bad knees as:

A + B + C divided by D - E + F

Have you ever thought you might be better off taking up, say, scrabble?

You can play online, on facebook, at any time.

Shame he got it wrong with you though ay Mace?

I'm kidding mate, only kidding, I'll bet you're a lovely lad.

Have you ever thought you might be better off taking up, say, scrabble?

You can play online, on facebook, at any time.

Dave - plays Scrabble and Facebook.

Not a good CV Dave.

Dave - plays Scrabble and Facebook.

Not a good CV Dave.

Barry - starts loopy threads on SS at uncivilised times of the day.

Is that a better CV Barry?

You see, I'm spotting the pattern here on this thread.

Whereby I post a harmless, maybe at a glance humorous post, and get a tad of light hearted stick, whereby I respond in a light hearted manner....and then it just degenerates.

I'm not having a pop at Mace and the other lad nor their responses to this post but I think I've just seen where I maybe going wrong on here.

Mmmmmm!

Shame he got it wrong with you though ay Mace?

Depends on how you equate right and wrong Barry.

As your equations don't seem to add up I've no worries eh

Barry - starts loopy threads on SS at uncivilised times of the day.

Is that a better CV Barry?

Dave - we are talking right now, which negates your 'uncivilised times' angle - and if you think that Scrabble and Facebook have more relevance as a post on the SS forum than my 'loopy' posts then....

...I'll leave that open to the board.

The above post now proves my 'degenerating' thoughts above.

Cheers Dave.

Depends on how you equate right and wrong Barry.

As your equations don't seem to add up I've no worries eh

Don't bite Mace.

You are aren't you?

Depends on how you equate right and wrong Barry.

As your equations don't seem to add up I've no worries eh

See, there's another one.

Don't bite Mace.

You are aren't you?

I don't bite....I bait.....that's a clever little play on words.

Scrabble anyone

Steve - the old 'Equations Game' is a good 'un - try it sometime - that was just a flash entry you know!?

(and I don't often give the old avatars a work out mate, that bast*rd was just for you)

Actually Barry, in your thread title you say "Bombers = MC2". Surely a proper drugs reference would show that "E = MC2" just as that scientist bloke said it did

Barry - starts loopy threads on SS at uncivilised times of the day.

Is that a better CV Barry?

Morning Dave...long time no see.

Hope you're well and all that.

Actually Barry, in your thread title you say "Bombers = MC2". Surely a proper drugs reference would show that "E = MC2" just as that scientist bloke said it did

E (apart from certain Soulies in 'The Disco Room' at Bradford) had little relevance to me or the Soul scene in general Steve, which is why....do I need to?

Dave - we are talking right now, which negates your 'uncivilised times' angle - and if you think that Scrabble and Facebook have more relevance as a post on the SS forum than my 'loopy' posts then....

...I'll leave that open to the board.

The above post now proves my 'degenerating' thoughts above.

Cheers Dave.

I wasn't suggesting relevence mate, merely trying to offer you an easing to your torment!

Oh, and regarding the time, I will not still be posting at 5.00 am.

Pip pip.

Well bugger me, for once these responses have left me lost for words.

E (apart from certain Soulies in 'The Disco Room' at Bradford) had little relevance to me or the Soul scene in general Steve, which is why....do I need to?

That scientist bloke (Professor Big Audio Dynamite if I remember correctly) had a top ten hit with it Barry. Thats good enough for me.

That scientist bloke (Professor Big Audio Dynamite if I remember correctly) had a top ten hit with it Barry. Thats good enough for me.

He was also a God in The Clash mate, wrong bloke to administer your 'knowledge' to.

Well bugger me, for once these responses have left me lost for words.

Not always a bad thing Barry.

Anyhows, I've had my fun so I'm off to bed.

Turn the lights off when you're done

Morning Dave...long time no see.

Hope you're well and all that.

Eh up Mace

Sorry, missed that first time through.

I am in fine fettle thanks, and trust you're the same?

Not always a bad thing Barry.

Anyhows, I've had my fun so I'm off to bed.

Turn the lights off when you're done

The last word was yours mate.

(the use of avatars definately drop's your machismo mate btw - G'night now.)

He was also a God in The Clash mate, wrong bloke to administer your 'knowledge' to.

Ooooh dear ! Sorry to hijack your thread. Keep on posting to yourself then.

Eh up Mace

Sorry, missed that first time through.

I am in fine fettle thanks, and trust you're the same?

Healthy, wealthy and wise thanks mate.

Need some kip though, so I'll leave you to it.

Just like the owd days eh

Ooooh dear ! Sorry to hijack your thread. Keep on posting to yourself then.

Oh Steve, stop it, I had you and that sleepy Mace fella beat, hands down, just accept it and read my above posts regarding 'degenerating threads'.

It's so easy to form a little 'thread alliance' twixt a few of you and parlez vous about how w*nk my posts are - but at least I start 'em and don't simply take the easy 'take a pot-shot at Barry' angle knowing that there will be other lazy arses with nowt better to say that will join in, yo bump me tally up.

Know what I mean hehe?

Healthy, wealthy and wise thanks mate.

Need some kip though, so I'll leave you to it.

Just like the owd days eh

HA ha, shades of the Stoke threads! Only slightly more abstract?

Oh Steve, stop it, I had you and that sleepy Mace fella beat, hands down, just accept it and read my above posts regarding 'degenerating threads'.

It's so easy to form a little 'thread alliance' twixt a few of you and parlez vous about how w*nk my posts are - but at least I start 'em and don't simply take the easy 'take a pot-shot at Barry' angle knowing that there will be other lazy arses with nowt better to say that will join in, yo bump me tally up.

Know what I mean hehe?

As Dave refers to in the post after yours Barry, both Mace and Dave were founder members of the "Stoke thread" * (Don't bother looking for the posts, seriously, don't ) and i form no alliances with those sort of people

'Night

* Better known as the "Somewhere to go when you're too depressed to kill yourself" thread

As Dave refers to in the post after yours Barry, both Mace and Dave were founder members of the "Stoke thread" * (Don't bother looking for the posts, seriously, don't ) and i form no alliances with those sort of people

'Night

* Better known as the "Somewhere to go when you're too depressed to kill yourself" thread

I don't understand the question Pete?

As Dave refers to in the post after yours Barry, both Mace and Dave were founder members of the "Stoke thread" * (Don't bother looking for the posts, seriously, don't ) and i form no alliances with those sort of people

'Night

* Better known as the "Somewhere to go when you're too depressed to kill yourself" thread

And do pray tell Mr Mannion, in the interests of presenting a true history, how did that masterpiece compare with the ill-fated "Sheffield thread"?

*BTW, I am making a book on what time this thread will be consigned to freebasing. 7.00 am is 6/4 fav.

And do pray tell Mr Mannion, in the interests of presenting a true history, how did that masterpiece compare with the ill-fated "Sheffield thread"?

*BTW, I am making a book on what time this thread will be consigned to freebasing. 7.00 am is 6/4 fav.

Even with all the casualties and recklings we had on the Sheffield thread, we were a very very poor second Dave.

Thank God

I think somebodys been freebasing already

I think somebodys been freebasing already

Mate, such a poor, yet expected, typical response from someone I would have thought would be old enough to know better.

You may look clever to the one, two, maybe three you wanted to - but to the rest....you simply look poor.

I'm still happy as f*ck.

How are you mate?