Denbo

You HAVE done your homework, knowing that it was burnt down in 1903. Or, were you REALLY there . . . . . . Macloud?

Hmmm. Good points. What's your solution then?

I imagine it's the same today and I'm sure nobody objects to that. It's the playing of something more than a couple of times of records that have already been broken, or worse still, played out records being played 3 or 4 times in one night. Not when there is so many other good records to be played.

Can I have; 49. Steve Alaimo 4 track promo E.P 5135 with "I wake up crying " which is wonderful 60's midtempo. Chess paper sleeve.

Sorry, this is not an answer to your question, just me being inquisitive. I like that avatar. What exactly is it? I see '68 Remix. Does this mean it's a different take of the issued version?

"I would also say I dont think repeats of new stuff should be discouraged, I asked JT to play something a second time in one of his sets at Lifeline, although he refrained. Sometimes particularly today it is a good way to get things noticed for new stuff." That's a good point. Often, when a new 'discovery' is being pushed, it DOES need to be played more than once in a night, depending I suppose on how long the night is.

Hi Tommy

No, he's not saying that at all. This is what he said; "The writing down by the DJ wouldn't work for me. With 2 and a bit minutes records and people up on stage for requests, I don't have time. If I've been upstairs at the 100 Club working or just extra dozy, I ask someone who's stationed themselves at the front of the stage most of the night." And by that he means for him personally, it wouldn't work because he's busy running the venue as smoothly as he can, such that he doesn't get to hear everything that gets played before he does his spot, so he asks others what has been played in order to avoid playing something that has already been played. Now when he's a guest DJ, to the best of my knowledge, he normally turns up early, partly to listen to what's being played for a feel of what's working and also to avoid where possible playing something already played earlier, but the real truth is he'll have you believe, so that he can get pissed sooner.

Exactly. Well put Sir. That's what I said but put more eloquently.

And perhaps therein lies part of the problem, ego. Or perhaps arrogance. Or even sheer ignorance. Venue organisers should insist on it, afer all, thay are paying the DJs wages and they also want to keep their punters happy.

Unbelievable. I didn't know that but I'm glad I do now. That really hit the spot. It was very touching and I'm glad you posted it here on Soul Source. My old mate Frank Jackson, if he were alive today, would be blubbering tears all over the place right now as Darrell Banks was by far one of his all-time favourite recording artists. Thinking of you big fella. Dennis.

I haven't looked to see if anybody else has made the following suggestions, but here goes anyway; 1. DJs on later should be there early enough to listen to what's being played before he or she goes on. 2. If that can't be done, then perhaps each DJ should write a quick note of what he or she has played for the benefit of the DJs who come later, and the punters who have been there since it opened. There, hope that's not too complicated for anybody?

Happy New Year to you too 'Mel-da blue-nose'

Haven't got it Mel but here's some info on it; EXCELLO 2302 STACEY LANE (feat. Travis Wammack on gtr; both sides co-written by T. Wammack) Funky Little Train / No Brags Just Facts 1969 US Did Tully phone you yet?

Also came out on the 1973 UK Rediffusion various artists Lp entitled "Hey Paula, Hey Baby, Last Kiss . . . and Other American Teenage Classics", which is probably quite rare now. Be warned however, apart from Pic & Bill, 'All I Want Is You', 'Dead' is the only decent track on the Lp. God knows how 'Dead' sneaked out mixed in with this lot. Very strange?

Also, take a closer look at the triangular centre. It's not symmetrical from all three sides. One side has a slight difference, suggesting it is the 'base' of the triangle. Look at us, what a pair of nerds

It's definitely German as it has 'Made in Germany' very neatly pressed into the runout grooves, unlike the UK labels. As for the little blobs 'melted' into the vinyl / label. I'm not so sure that's entirely correct. If you hold the 45 up to the light, you can just see a tiny gap, which means to me that the triangular centre is most probably designed to be carefully pushed out, if need be. Not that I would, for fear of damaging the paper label.

Kind of true but I wouldn't want to dislodge one for fear of damaging the paper label, which are easily equal in quality to the UK labels.

No, it's an integral part of the record. Another thing, did you notice how the triangular centre is NOT equal on all sides. Can't remember the mathematical terminilogy for that last comment?

No, sorry it doesn't. Why?

Try this.

I'll see what I can do.

That's true. Also includes labels like Atlantic, London, Columbia, etc, as well.

Does this mean you have it on South African RCA 7"?