I   believe that when Little Richard  did the vocals  for the (world famous) Upsetters on Little Star 123 , his name   could not be put on the label - probably due to contractual reasons.

The two songs were  Fats Domino tunes: Every night about this time/ I`m in love again.

I`m interested to see that  the Little Star issue  ,as if to remind people of the obvious presence of Richard, titled the latter track as "Yes it`s me (I`m in love again)`.

This variation is unlisted by Discogs  and may not be so common and so more valuable ,   Any thoughts anyone ?   

If you have it, which titles are on your copy  ?   

Datcogs entries are 'open sourced' fed and now (or was it not long ago and not anymore ?) to do so one has to go through a "chart" of procedures with some kind of "board of the wise" (whatever) voters to accept one's addition...

Like some others on here I don't bother anymore to add new entries or make corrections there plus their more than poor buyer & seller service post Covid where they made a lot of bucks has really ruined my sympathy for them.

Although I still tend do so on 45.com more willingly. Check it there. Not a sale's site though but with enthusiast and / or passionate folks. There's two scans of your copy of the same or similar issue (with alt. title 'Yes it's me').

4 minutes ago, Tlscapital said:

Datcogs entries are 'open sourced' fed and now (or was it not long ago and not anymore ?) to do so one has to go through a "chart" of procedures with some kind of "board of the wise" (whatever) voters to accept one's addition...

Like some others on here I don't bother anymore to add new entries or make corrections there plus their more than poor buyer & seller service post Covid where they made a lot of bucks has really ruined my sympathy for them.

Although I still tend do so on 45.com more willingly. Check it there. Not a sale's site though but with enthusiast and / or passionate folks. There's two scans of your copy of the same or similar issue (with alt. title 'Yes it's me').

I have tried to add information that I knew to be fact, trying to correct inaccuracies on the site and got voted down a few times.  Some of the inaccuracies had no source yet it was allowed over fact, barmy way to run the wikepedia of records and the artists.

Yes Dis Cogs fail to correct the issue of the Bobby Parker album - a perfectly legitimate issue -...banning its sale on their site and not responding to the question  why ....

3 hours ago, Footpath said:

Yes Dis Cogs fail to correct the issue of the Bobby Parker album - a perfectly legitimate issue -...banning its sale on their site and not responding to the question  why ....

Corporates !