Briles Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 Keep getting tempted to buy one of these on the Soul City label, knowing that some of these releases are original British issues, but some aren't, but not sure on this one, can anyone help pls ? Thx Dave. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
pikeys dog Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 wouldn't touch any of the Soul City mkII records with a barge pole... Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Newer Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 I have the Jesse James 45, how else would you get it? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Briles Posted June 30, 2008 Author Share Posted June 30, 2008 wouldn't touch any of the Soul City mkII records with a barge pole... Fair enough mate cheers. It's the early one's that are bona fide things then, like Chris Jackson Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Tabs Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 (edited) Fair enough mate cheers. It's the early one's that are bona fide things then, like Chris Jackson Soul City label n the 60's was the first incarnation. It was one of Dave Godin's babies and was all pukka and above board. The later 'reactivation' label is best described as suspect. Sam Dees is deffo in the later category See you in a couple of weeks Dave. Edited June 30, 2008 by Tabs Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
pikeys dog Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 I have the Jesse James 45, how else would you get it? I wouldn't - that's the point.... Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Chalky Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 (edited) I was told they didn't have the rights to use the Soul City name for the recent releases. I'd have my doubts too over the licensing of some of the tracks as well. Edited June 30, 2008 by chalky Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Tabs Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 I was told they didn't have the rights to use the Soul City name for the recent releases. I'd have my doubts too over the licensing of some of the tracks as well. Agree with you Chalky. Hence the use of suspect in my post. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!