Posted October 4, 200519 yr FOR ME THE IMPALAS VERSION IS TOTALLY AWSOME, ALL THIS AND ITS CHEAPER AS WELL GROUP SOUL DOES IT FOR ME, HOW IS IT FOR YOU
October 4, 200519 yr betty moorer for me without a doubt ...... stronger vocal with more passion that for me makes the impalas sound wishy washy and weak Davie
October 4, 200519 yr I`ve got both,but it`s "Betty Moorer" for me.................... Dave f..............
October 4, 200519 yr betty moorer for me without a doubt ...... stronger vocal with more passion that for me makes the impalas sound wishy washy and weak Davie WISHY WASHY, IN'T THAT SOMEONE WHO WORKS IN A CHINESE LAUNDRY?? STILL I SUPPOSE ITS BETTER THAN SAYING ITS SH**E
October 4, 200519 yr I`ve got both,but it`s "Betty Moorer" for me.................... Dave f.............. Me too and errr me too Can't go wrong with a Betty
October 4, 200519 yr FOR ME THE IMPALAS VERSION IS TOTALLY AWSOME, ALL THIS AND ITS CHEAPER AS WELL GROUP SOUL DOES IT FOR ME, HOW IS IT FOR YOU I've had both and I don't particularly like either - I'm sure The Impalas is cheaper, but when I sold my copy via Ebay a few years back, it fetched about £125 - I was gobsmacked Girf
October 4, 200519 yr It's got to be BETTY,The production and sound far outway the Impalas version imo.
October 5, 200519 yr Betty for sure, Regular spin for my mate Steve Mc Williams at Lytham. May get an outing this Saturday
Daved 1 post
soulmac 1 post
Girthdevon 1 post
Sunnysoul 1 post
FOR ME THE IMPALAS VERSION IS TOTALLY AWSOME,
ALL THIS AND ITS CHEAPER AS WELL
GROUP SOUL DOES IT FOR ME, HOW IS IT FOR YOU