- Replies 21
- Views 10.2k
- Created
- Last Reply
Most active in this topic
-
Northern Soul Uk 6 posts
-
Roburt 5 posts
-
Pete S 2 posts
-
Prophonics 2029 2 posts
Most Popular Posts
-
Well we had a very similar thread about 3 weeks ago & the person who started it wouldn't accept that Emidiscs started life as official EMI acetates at the start of the 60's (or even a
-
Emidisc's were EMI's offical acetates, thus Stateside, HMV, Columbia label stuff (& more) were put on Emidiscs. Of course, EMI made Emidisc's for outside parties -- other labels in the 60's
-
Being the purchaser of this very fine version, its great to see the reaction when I tell the enquirer that its The Barron Knights ! A superb version of the song.
It has long angered me that sellers advertise Emidiscs as acetates?
There is a huge difference am I correct?
In my experience I have always thought that an acetate is the disc that that is cut after a recording has been recorded to press the actual records from or a similar thing. Whereas Emidiscs where made by various DJs etc. with the correct equipment (Emidisc machine) to copy valuable records that either they couldn't get the original pressing of, or with the intention to sell them on, Bootleggers in essence.
Usually the illegal pressings (Emidiscs) will have a different record by different artists on both sides, whereas legit Acetates from a pressing plant will have the intended records by the intended artist on both A and B sides, and sometimes are single sided.
I think it's only fair that the sellers claiming that they are selling Acetates and are obviously selling illegal pressings should state that fact so as not to confuse or pull the wool.
I have also noticed that some legit acetates bear the name 'Emidisc' but it is quite easy to tell an original acetate from a bootlegged Emidisc, from the track listings.
What do you think?
Edited by Steve Luigi