what should i be paying for this please 

kev

About £30 tops for a black vinyl copy, less for Red

About £30 tops for a black vinyl copy, less for Red

thanks nev 

Its a boot innit ?

 

Russ

Got one for £16 Black vinyl (plus £2.50 recorded)

 

Des

Edited March 18, 201510 yr by SOUL INC

Its a boot innit ?

Russ

Maybe the red one but think the black is legit, but think your referring to the fact it was never issued originally and found yrs later than originally recorded... Without digging out the finer details Russ

Previously unreleased recording that was pressed up and first passed off as a rare record

I first heard Tim Brown play it on the Richard Searling show. I think he explains the background on here.RICHARD SEARLING SHOW JAZZ FM NORTHERN SOUL GUEST TIM BROWN: https://youtu.be/R2D3fibsWaY

I cant listen to the YT clip right now, as im at work, but didnt they come from the Las Vegas connection ?...if so i wouldnt hold my breath on them being kosher.

 

Best Russ

It was unreleased Russ. It's the only way to own it on vinyl and it's a killer tune.

I cant listen to the YT clip right now, as im at work, but didnt they come from the Las Vegas connection ?...if so i wouldnt hold my breath on them being kosher.

 

Best Russ

some were stung when this first surfaced I was offered one at a fair amount by some one from Carlisle fortunately didn't bite

It was unreleased Russ. It's the only way to own it on vinyl and it's a killer tune.

I agree Jordi, its a top class tune for sure, my only thoughts are that of whether it was a legal re issue or a boot.

 

Hope you are well mate.

 

Best Russ

I agree Jordi, its a top class tune for sure, my only thoughts are that of whether it was a legal re issue or a boot.

 

Hope you are well mate.

 

Best Russ

 

Legit as it was pressed up by the label's owner, a 'boot' insofar as it was seen as a con to whip up interest (and money) by being passed off as a rare 60s discovery.

Legit as it was pressed up by the label's owner, a 'boot' insofar as it was seen as a con to whip up interest (and money) by being passed off as a rare 60s discovery.

 

I never knew this had been tried to be passed on as a rare 60's discovery. Surely one look at the label and vinyl would tell anyone that it wasn't a piece of 60's vinyl...or am I getting the wrong end of the stick here?

I never knew this had been tried to be passed on as a rare 60's discovery. Surely one look at the label and vinyl would tell anyone that it wasn't a piece of 60's vinyl...or am I getting the wrong end of the stick here?

 

More here