OK, I referred to this in the current thread for Bury Town Hall.
I have received a letter pertaining to be from the 'anti bullying soul group .co.uk' which, basically, tells me who I should and should not allow into my events at Bury Town Hall.
(By the way - I've checked and the website doesn't exist)
At this early stage I must re-iterate: It is NOT my intention to re-open the debate regarding the events at the weekender. Principally because it is NONE of my business and my opinions of the WHO? WHAT? WHERE? do not matter.
Only those people involved know exactly what happened and, probably more importantly, what happened in the time before the incident. Whatever the reasons, it wasn't a "Spontaneous Human Disagreement" - there must be a complex background to it all and only those folk know what that is.
From what I could see and read from the thread when it was live, the ONLY thing that was conclusive about what happened was that the whole thing was INCONCLUSIVE!
Notwithstanding that, for ANYBODY to deign to the right to demand that I ban this or that person from a third party position, having actually been broad when the incident took place, is a step over the line and one which will be treated with the contempt it deserves.
Anybody who is or has been a regular at Bury Town Hall will know that in the event of ANY signs of a problem from ANY individual will be dealt with by myself, personally, there and then.
There have been 3 instances in almost nine years when the odd individual (in all but one case, non-soulies who have allowed booze to get the better of them) have made a nuicance of themselves in my venue.
On each occasion, they have been out of the door and barred before anybody else has even realised that there was even a sniff of a problem. That is my policy and it has served me well.
Irrespective of who it may be, If I thought that a person or group was engaged in bullying, piss-taking or anything else unsavoury within my venue, I will ask them to stop / leave depending on the gravity of what is going on.
I know the individuals involved in the incident referred to. I count them all as pals and, awkward though it may be, am not prepared to start banning either on the back of an emotional, uninformed outburst from an anonymous source who feels that have the power of veto over the attendees at my venue.
Any real frend of the scene or indeed, friend of my venue, would at least have the courtesy to talk to me directly.
Even in a case of catatonic shyness keeping them from talking to or phoning me, signing the letter would, perhaps, have lent some credibility to the contents of their letter.
Als, neither are the case so I am left with no recourse other than the obvious, which is to go with what I feel to be the best thing for my venue and the security of the people who good enough to support what we do month in month out.
On that basis, I will carry on as before and I fully expect that people will respect my outlook on other peoples business by not bringing it into my event and making it an issue for others who are not involved to worry about. Anything different, from anybody - not just those involved in the case in point - would not be welcome.
Some people may contest my approach and that's fair enough. I stand by my philosophy based on what works for me and my venue.
I am not casting for opinion or support. I am merely bringing to the wider attention, the sort of B-S that is going on in the background that is making the promoting of any event even more difficult that it already is.
My message to the Anti Bullying Soul Group.Co.Uk is this:
1. Unless armed with water-tight facts and the power of attourney of both sides, don't get involved. You will end up looking silly.
2. Don't judge events from overseas. How stupid did Blair sound every time he told us all was fine in Iraq?
3. Lead by example. Trying to bully promoters is not the best business case for your cause given your (probably) well intended name.
I have attached high res. scans of the letter so that you can judge the content for yourselves and close by saying again. I DO NOT want to re-open the debate about the event in June. I only want to publicise some of the less savoury fall-out and let the authors of this letter know that they will NOT achieve anything by trying to intimidate me into running my event in a certain way.
OK, I referred to this in the current thread for Bury Town Hall.
I have received a letter pertaining to be from the 'anti bullying soul group .co.uk' which, basically, tells me who I should and should not allow into my events at Bury Town Hall.
(By the way - I've checked and the website doesn't exist)
At this early stage I must re-iterate: It is NOT my intention to re-open the debate regarding the events at the weekender. Principally because it is NONE of my business and my opinions of the WHO? WHAT? WHERE? do not matter.
Only those people involved know exactly what happened and, probably more importantly, what happened in the time before the incident. Whatever the reasons, it wasn't a "Spontaneous Human Disagreement" - there must be a complex background to it all and only those folk know what that is.
From what I could see and read from the thread when it was live, the ONLY thing that was conclusive about what happened was that the whole thing was INCONCLUSIVE!
Notwithstanding that, for ANYBODY to deign to the right to demand that I ban this or that person from a third party position, having actually been broad when the incident took place, is a step over the line and one which will be treated with the contempt it deserves.
Anybody who is or has been a regular at Bury Town Hall will know that in the event of ANY signs of a problem from ANY individual will be dealt with by myself, personally, there and then.
There have been 3 instances in almost nine years when the odd individual (in all but one case, non-soulies who have allowed booze to get the better of them) have made a nuicance of themselves in my venue.
On each occasion, they have been out of the door and barred before anybody else has even realised that there was even a sniff of a problem. That is my policy and it has served me well.
Irrespective of who it may be, If I thought that a person or group was engaged in bullying, piss-taking or anything else unsavoury within my venue, I will ask them to stop / leave depending on the gravity of what is going on.
I know the individuals involved in the incident referred to. I count them all as pals and, awkward though it may be, am not prepared to start banning either on the back of an emotional, uninformed outburst from an anonymous source who feels that have the power of veto over the attendees at my venue.
Any real frend of the scene or indeed, friend of my venue, would at least have the courtesy to talk to me directly.
Even in a case of catatonic shyness keeping them from talking to or phoning me, signing the letter would, perhaps, have lent some credibility to the contents of their letter.
Als, neither are the case so I am left with no recourse other than the obvious, which is to go with what I feel to be the best thing for my venue and the security of the people who good enough to support what we do month in month out.
On that basis, I will carry on as before and I fully expect that people will respect my outlook on other peoples business by not bringing it into my event and making it an issue for others who are not involved to worry about. Anything different, from anybody - not just those involved in the case in point - would not be welcome.
Some people may contest my approach and that's fair enough. I stand by my philosophy based on what works for me and my venue.
I am not casting for opinion or support. I am merely bringing to the wider attention, the sort of B-S that is going on in the background that is making the promoting of any event even more difficult that it already is.
My message to the Anti Bullying Soul Group.Co.Uk is this:
1. Unless armed with water-tight facts and the power of attourney of both sides, don't get involved. You will end up looking silly.
2. Don't judge events from overseas. How stupid did Blair sound every time he told us all was fine in Iraq?
3. Lead by example. Trying to bully promoters is not the best business case for your cause given your (probably) well intended name.
I have attached high res. scans of the letter so that you can judge the content for yourselves and close by saying again. I DO NOT want to re-open the debate about the event in June. I only want to publicise some of the less savoury fall-out and let the authors of this letter know that they will NOT achieve anything by trying to intimidate me into running my event in a certain way.
Neil Jones.