anyone got a scan of above , noticed other week a wd with bit different font wise at bottom than own

after a gander at one with large font at bottom

ta

mike

Is it this one Mike?

.

Edited November 2, 201113 yr by nick hackett

Is it this one Mike?

yep cheers pikey

noticed was a diference between own and one up for sale,

thanks for posting scan as its all clear now

had it in me head for some reason that own was a wd but when took time to have a proper look

come clear when reliased derrr.... was a issue

always consider this a fine example of sleazy northern

was told a old searling play, any more background ?

talking about other version by sisters three at w/end said will post sound clip

will do in a bit if can find

different approach to it complelty

thanks

mike

always consider this a fine example of sleazy northern

was told a old searling play, any more background ?

talking about other version by sisters three at w/end said will post sound clip

will do in a bit if can find

different approach to it complelty

thanks

mike

Whats the Sisters Three called Mike, You Can Forget It?

Dunno about CYQ being old Searling spin but defffo had spins in the 80's. Almost as good as Someone to Love by him

Whats the Sisters Three called Mike, You Can Forget It?

Dunno about CYQ being old Searling spin but defffo had spins in the 80's. Almost as good as Someone to Love by him

yep its the flip of that, bit disapointing, perhaps as was expecting a sleazy female version

hang on -searching for it

someone to love just aint got that sleaze factor imo , soul with a snarl, attitude thing

here s sisters 3 take on it

Can You Qualify Sisters Three.mp3

yep its the flip of that, bit disapointing, perhaps as was expecting a sleazy female version

hang on -searching for it

someone to love just aint got that sleaze factor imo , soul with a snarl, attitude thing

here s sisters 3 take on it

pretty poor really Mike. Just listened to the other side and the intro to that is similiar to Ozz & Spurling take of CYQ.

pretty poor really Mike. Just listened to the other side and the intro to that is similiar to Ozz & Spurling take of CYQ.

must be some connection, havent sister 3 anymore so cant check, anyone know ?

must be some connection, havent sister 3 anymore so cant check, anyone know ?

Same label owners I think, both San Francisco? Not the only two in the label group either, Dave Frynn points out on Anorak's Corner that El Camino has the same label details and typeface as Goldenway. Didn't they get bought by Fantasy in the end? Sure Ady C can tell us. Will never be able to find both at same time to check, if can will do so tonight.

Sisters Three version of CYQ is dire though IMVHO

Edited February 20, 200619 yr by Stuart T

Sisters Three version of CYQ is dire though IMVHO

quite agree but I love YCFI

Whats the Sisters Three called Mike, You Can Forget It?

Same label owners I think, both San Francisco? Not the only two in the label group either, Dave Frynn points out on Anorak's Corner that El Camino has the same label details and typeface as Goldenway. Didn't they get bought by Fantasy in the end? Sure Ady C can tell us. Will never be able to find both at same time to check, if can will do so tonight.

Sisters Three version of CYQ is dire though IMVHO

El Camino and Goldenway were funded by the same people.I Think CYQ maybe the only release on Goldenway. Jesse Osbourne was an A&R man for Galaxy/Fantasy which is presumably why Sisters Three got hold of CYQ

yep its the flip of that, bit disapointing, perhaps as was expecting a sleazy female version

hang on -searching for it

someone to love just aint got that sleaze factor imo , soul with a snarl, attitude thing

here s sisters 3 take on it

Blimey don't think I'd have recognised that as the same song (well maybe when they sang "Can You Qualify" )... quite like it in a laidback girl groupy sort of way but next to Ozz just doesn't compare... he is sleazy sounding alright