Jump to content
  • Replies 54
  • Views 7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Most Popular Posts

  • These are the Mir-A-Don guys ... Archie Powell is in the middle Andy

  • Frankie Crocker
    Frankie Crocker

    No, sensible spending on a really good, very scarce record. As an early unknown sound a decade ago, £250 was a real bargain. Today, with demand greatly exceeding supply, whatever it takes to secure a

  • December on ebay it sold for over $900 https://www.ebay.com/itm/181961588189?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT It was £300 or so when there was a few copies abou

Posted Images

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, chalky said:

Yes I understand you were referring to the ommission.  Would tax on studio time be payable by American Playboy though and not Crazy Cajun even though Crazy Cajun was the parent company? Besides dont the artists pay the studio time from sales, dependant on the contract of course. It is a minefield with nothing seemingly straight forward

The ommission does seem strange though after it is referenced by Beth & Jimmy whoever they are? Maybe only ten tracks were allowed?

When was FFFTG released?  Are there any issues, all scans I can find are DJ copies.

IF tax was payed by American Playboy on studio time,then by implying studio time was needed again by Crazy cajun,that how you get 2 lots of tax back (rebate) for one recording session.

Artists could well be charged for studio time i dont know,but the record label would be the ones claiming back tax? - i think.! Minefield.! Maybe Ian D could shed light on it.

Sorry, this is off topic concerning FFFTG.

On 04 March 2016 at 16:54, chalky said:

Thanks to John Anderson and Dave Welding a cracking photo of the Ascots in question!

56d9bdac94760_TalmadgeArmstrongTheAscots

Same shot used for the Crazy Cajun LP.

Get involved with Soul Source