just watched this go through ebay at 30 quid, didnt bid for some strange reason, anyone else see it, i know its not soul but it has history

Is it just my eyes, or does the label look like it's been cut out with scissors? Why was the picture of this record so out of focus & all the other ones in focus?

Is it just my eyes, or does the label look like it's been cut out with scissors? Why was the picture of this record so out of focus & all the other ones in focus?

Don't look right at all - a photocopy of an original label stuck on to a...?

Derek

Don't look right at all - a photocopy of an original label stuck on to a...?

Derek

I have seen this record before on ebay and the label has been copied on to the acetate

I think the seller makes it clear it is a copy I think a real acetate copy manship want's a lot of money for. Proberley just look good framed on the wall

Edited April 13, 200916 yr by Guest

I have seen this record before on ebay and the label has been copied on to the acetate

I think the seller makes it clear it is a copy I think a real acetate copy manship want's a lot of money for. Proberley just look good framed on the wall

Here's the sellers description :

Rare one sided promo Lorraine Silver Lost summer love on PYE promo stamped 20th AUGUST 1965 record is E comes in PYE sleeve

Here's the sellers description :

Rare one sided promo Lorraine Silver Lost summer love on PYE promo stamped 20th AUGUST 1965 record is E comes in PYE sleeve

As opposed to

Not at all rare one-sided carver with badly photocopied label stuck on

Derek

As opposed to

Not at all rare one-sided carver with badly photocopied label stuck on

Derek

Well I am sure last time I saw it it said label came of or something must have relisted it. What a naughty seller

For a start, there's no one sided demo of this record. Useless photocopied label, can't see the point.

Here's what it should be like - Not single sided but both released songs

Here's the sellers description :

Rare one sided promo Lorraine Silver Lost summer love on PYE promo stamped 20th AUGUST 1965 record is E comes in PYE sleeve

I'm pretty sure that very record came from me, sold in a pack of 5 70s "cut for Northern Soul boys" acetates for £7 or so in the Friday drop-down auction. can't 100% remember but it has been through my hands in recent times and yes it's a fake label.

I'm pretty sure that very record came from me, sold in a pack of 5 70s "cut for Northern Soul boys" acetates for £7 or so in the Friday drop-down auction. can't 100% remember but it has been through my hands in recent times and yes it's a fake label.

I've seen this record in the last 2 months and I know where I saw it so can anyone tell me who the seller was please?

I've seen this record in the last 2 months and I know where I saw it so can anyone tell me who the seller was please?

sellers name is rascal100 from scotland

sellers name is rascal100 from scotland

Cheers. Not the one I saw then!

Cheers. Not the one I saw then!

he was selling his whole collection on e bay for £4000 about a month ago, included a nice copy of timi yuro,you could see the copy of l silver sticking out of his dj box on one of the photos,the collection didnt sell though

it looks very much to me an old EMI Disk with a very old photo copy of the demo lable, but years ago at Wiganpoeple were mugged of all the while in loads of ways, my fav way of buying was to get the kids walking around the bar area with there 45 box whip through the records if i spotted a couple of rare ones in a box of boots i would say what do you want for the whole box this worked for me 9x out of 10 as thay say DAVE KIL

My trusty spy reports the following information:

The 4K collection.

Item number: 160317142529 . That collections been broke up and being listed by rascals100.

BUT...the seller of the 4k collection, dianejane123 has bid on 290308255946 Jackie Wilson ... and won ....from Rascals100 which is a bit silly really cos they already had it in their collection that didn't sell for 4k if you look down the listing of the 4K auction..... Now why bid on it?? That dianejane users already got it in her 4k collection if she goes and looks hard enough .. ....oh I know, it's called Shill Bidding innit ...talk about dim

My trusty spy reports the following information:

The 4K collection.

Item number: 160317142529 . That collections been broke up and being listed by rascals100.

BUT...the seller of the 4k collection, dianejane123 has bid on 290308255946 Jackie Wilson ... and won ....from Rascals100 which is a bit silly really cos they already had it in their collection that didn't sell for 4k if you look down the listing of the 4K auction..... Now why bid on it?? That dianejane users already got it in her 4k collection if she goes and looks hard enough .. ....oh I know, it's called Shill Bidding innit ...talk about dim

4k collection had a few nice items in it, but from the listing i couldnt really tell if half of the records were, originals,boots reissues or what.actually think he was tryin to pass the salvadors as original if you look at the listing,also has lynne randell 2 copys one is radio station copy 5-10147 which is same as mine,but advertising another copy, white radio copy z4kk-0041, you shed any light on this copy pete s

Here's what the demo looks like

Why on the scan of the acetate does the release date say 20th august '69 shouldn't it be be '65?

Think it was actually bought for the other side - it's better.

glad i was too tired (and drunk) to place a bid at the time, thanks everybody

Here's what the demo looks like

Why on the scan of the acetate does the release date say 20th august '69 shouldn't it be be '65?

It doesn't say 69, it says 65 - just a dark scan - the list number shows a 5 in the 15922 release number -tis the same