Chalky

This topic doesn't seem to have a course though Pete that is my argument. It isn't even going round in circles, it just seems to be off topic and what has happened in the past when asking for requests the last page or so. I'm not one for closing topics, I've closed very few but this one has to get back on whatever course it was on and less of the off topic. Yes he has done the same thing again, elsewhere and the outcome is no different is it. No other fresh opinion has been entered for debate.

Under Lynn's Flower Box wasn't there a little shop that sold decent clobber, went down some spiral staircase? Entrance was right on the corner. I was in town yesterday and noticed Hudson's had closed down I can just about remember the Record Centre but I'd have still been at school at the time.

I'm am not saying "not talk about it". This argument over Colin Curtis was done a few weeks ago, a whole lengthy topic. This whole argument about OVO, reissues, cds, downloads has been discussed countless times, a quick search of the forum will verify that. The outcome is always the same and the argument is always the same. Nothing different what so ever is different in this topic to the don't know how many before it. There is never any outcome or resolution to the original only vs. boots/reissue debates, it is always split between those who care and those who don't. Maybe those who just read have a different opinion, an opinion that could be of value to the "discussion"? And from a moderators point of view the topic seems to have little direction with too much off topic from the same usual suspects. There seems to be little engagement in discussion for the last couple of pages or so.

Just a week to go before the four intrepid golfers, Kitch, Teff, Colin Law and Andy McWhitmore and the vital support team of Jock and Chuddy aim to complete four rounds of golf in one day for a very worthy cause. Few more sponsors would be nice, try and break the £2k barrier?

Whoever you are and whatever collection you have, you never stop learning.

We had the whole Colin Curtis playing CD's when it happened at the Blackpool event. Do we really need all this again and again? It is the same arguments from pretty much the same people and one that will never get resolved simply because some care about the format and some couldn't give a sh*t.

N'er mind all that modern stuff, what about these two cover ups? Four Shades - Tonight - c/u Rosetta Hughes - Ooh Wee Baby I Love You - c/u It has been said Otis Jackson was covered as the Four Shades but dunno if this is the one?

I just think the intro is too long now he's f*cked about with it to be honest.

try the flip.....

two cover ups of Keb's, anyone remember what they were.... Four Shades - Tonight - c/u Rosetta Hughes - Ooh Wee Baby I Love You - c/u cheers

This will be the most recent other discussion regarding Cole....

Is this topic serving any purpose now? I certainly can't see any?

I haven't been able to get on line much lag day or so, what is this topic about? I don't think the topic kows where it is going nor those posting in it. Is this what I have to look forward to later on when catching up?

Something did happen Steve, I recorded the last one on my iPhone and uploaded to refosoul. I still have the four recordings at home. Same could be done this time and use mixcloud?

None of this is helping to secure the want and it isn't a discussion forum in wants so as I suggested if you wish to discuss the merits of this record then do so in LAYB?

Thats the trouble with "us" though don't you think. We exist in our own little bubble and don't realise there is more to soul music than what is discussed on forums like this. There is no modern soul as such on our scene as most of it is 30 years or so old. How crossover or 70's can be considered modern is beyond me.

most events advertised as "Modern Soul" are anything but Modern. The most modern record at some of these events is often one recorded in the 70's, some might stretch to the 80's.

unless you went to Lifeline or where Andy Dyson was djing it would have been a while before you heard it. It was covered up by him for ages and then Mace got his mits on one.

Play nicely chaps, no wish to close another topic. Some healthy debate but any insults or OTT language not needed. I'm sure those involved can look after themselves but not everyone the same, some are a touch more sensative.

There is nothing good about this record, vocal or instrumental.

This is a wants topic, you should only be replying if you can help mattfox with his wants. If you want o discuss the merits of any particular record them start a topic in Look At Your Box.

Don't quote me but if someone is an insignifican part of a bigger picture, i.e. dancer on the dancefloor then you don't need their permission. If the person being photographed is the main subject then you might need permission but they can always object and you can remove it. Should be plenty of reading on google if you google permission needed when taking photos of people. I rarely bother with people when I take the camera out, just the acts.

If you were coming across as a jackass I'd let you know don't worry, I'm not afraid to say what I think as a few will testify. If you don't have both then ye matrix details are needed but side by side it is easy to spot. The picture in post 27 clearly shows the colour difference. Hope you haven't been done over.

For this particular release it is spelt "Delreys" they also recorded for American, another Florida label but spelt with an "A". Original Boot and the group......

you don't need the matrix, the pictures in post 27 clearly show the darker green being the boot, the olive green the real one. One in each hand and the difference smacks you round the chops. The boot even looks like a boot.