Jump to content
  •  
Posted

You know the ones that have it mis-labled  and are on the lighter colour labels that look too new to me , are they really originals or a re issue, albeit a legit one . They just don't look right to me ?

 

any thoughts ,and I'm sure these have been mentioned in the past but couldn't find it

 

 

Cheers

 

Swifty :thumbsup:

  • Replies 16
  • Views 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Most Popular Posts

  •   Paul , I always thought that Jewel / Paula / Ronn started re-issuing / "second-issuing" its earlier product from the late 70's/early 80's and that the Montclairs mis-label 45 dates from

  • i never saw them until late 90`s and i think they would have regularly have been seen from the 70`s onwards if pressed then

  • Soul Shrews
    Soul Shrews

    They are certainly legal American reissues from the 90s.   The fun is that they pressed the wrong track on the flipside and the longer LP version too.   Cheers Paul

Featured Replies

You know the ones that have it mis-labled  and are on the lighter colour labels that look too new to me , are they really originals or a re issue, albeit a legit one . They just don't look right to me ?

 

any thoughts ,and I'm sure these have been mentioned in the past but couldn't find it

 

 

Cheers

 

Swifty :thumbsup:

 

I first got one late 90's so they've certainly been around a while

  • Author

I first got one late 90's so they've certainly been around a while

Pete , it's just that they look the same colour as some of the re-issued/ New  Paula stuff that was around at the time , nothing like the deep red what I would call originals ,

I had one that looked like those with a different artist each side , with different dated records . Just don't look right to me ?

 

Swifty :thumbsup:

They are certainly legal American reissues from the 90s.

 

The fun is that they pressed the wrong track on the flipside and the longer LP version too.

 

Cheers Paul

Edited by soul shrews

  • Author

So they aren't originals then , didn't think they were but the prices seem a bit steep

 

Cheers

 

Swifty :thumbsup:

 

p.s. if anyone has a W/D for sale please let me know

I'll stick to my UK Comtempo issue.

Is it just me or is the sound quality of the UK Contempo copy superior to the US release?

Cheers,

Dave

Is it just me or is the sound quality of the UK Contempo copy superior to the US release?

Cheers,

Dave

I think so, so your not the only one. There's 2 of us.

Edited by Gogs

Is it just me or is the sound quality of the UK Contempo copy superior to the US release?

Cheers,

Dave

Yes better quality and goes on for a few seconds longer than US copy

They are certainly legal American reissues from the 90s.

 

The fun is that they pressed the wrong track on the flipside and the longer LP version too.

 

Cheers Paul

 

Paul , I always thought that Jewel / Paula / Ronn started re-issuing / "second-issuing" its earlier product from the late 70's/early 80's and that the Montclairs mis-label 45 dates from that time period ?

Paul , I always thought that Jewel / Paula / Ronn started re-issuing / "second-issuing" its earlier product from the late 70's/early 80's and that the Montclairs mis-label 45 dates from that time period ?

i never saw them until late 90`s and i think they would have regularly have been seen from the 70`s onwards if pressed then

I think so, so your not the only one. There's 2 of us.

Cheers Guys. My copy is the UK release, great flip as well with "I need you mroe than ever"..quality double sider.

 

Dave

Paul , I always thought that Jewel / Paula / Ronn started re-issuing / "second-issuing" its earlier product from the late 70's/early 80's and that the Montclairs mis-label 45 dates from that time period ?

You may well be right sunnysoul but the labels print/colouring doesn"t look 70s/80s to me. Vinyl also looks a bit too "new" if you know what I mean,

See Mr Pinches post too

 

Cheers Paul

Get involved with Soul Source