Chalky

How many issues did Rod put out, 6?

The Hesitations - Is That The Way To Treat A Girl (You Bet It is) - GWP £60 Marion Javius - Waiting In The Wings - Encore Ex £30 Quinn Golden - Habit Breaker - Ecko Ex £60 (Rare on a 45, thought not to exist by many) Numonics - Forever And A Day/You Lied - Hodisk Ex £30 Numonics - One More Try - Hodisk £20 The Endeavours - I Know You Don’t Want Me - Stop Ex £35 Tiny Watkins - Run Run Run - Goodie Train Ex £100 Enchanted Five - Have You Ever/Try A Little Love - CVS Ex £60 (In-demand) Luke Day - Love Line - Renfro Ex £15 "‹I can send scans and sound files later if anyone interested. Payment: Paypal gift or add fees. Postage per 45. UK Signed for/recorded £2.50 Special Delivery £6.50 (over £40 as you are not covered with any less) Europe Int. Signed For = £8.80 up to £50. £11.40 up to £500 Rest of World = £9.80 up to £50. £12.40 up to £500 All records over £40 will be sent special delivery for insurance purposes. Records are often better than graded but if not happy for whatever reason then money back guarantee as long as the record is returned as posted.

He probably left most put for fear of being sued. The lawyers will have deleted so much from the orignal manuscript.

I have one, label has some damage, vinyl ok. I can scan and do sound file tonight.

Would demos go put to Juke Box service agents? I would have thought they wanted hits, local or national only, who would feed money into a machine if they didn't know the records, people tend to stick with what they know or what was the current rave. After all Juke boxes were big business and those who serviced them would want maximum return.

So we are saying that the only original press from the 70's is the one without the engineers credit. The one with engineers credit is a 90's press done from same plates which is basically what Cole was saying, you only have to read the posts directed at me. I basically don't disagree with you.. There are collectors, some on this topic who believe the one with the engineers credit is the original 70's press and will no doubt continue to believe that especially if they own one or someone is trying to sell one.

Doesn't Cole say in one of the links above in one of his replies that he added the arranger details to differentiate the two releases. This one I agree same plates, both originals and which came first is like the chicken and egg argument.

So both copies, with and without arranger have the backward 3? It woulds appear both came from the original plates then??? If that is the case then there is a third press with the standard "E" going by what is written in guides and discos??? As for what came first it will always be disputed but in the links you will read that Cole said he added the arranger to differentiate from the original 300 that were meant for friends and family only. But as Dave said what Elijah says can be taken with a pinch of salt at times.

I don't think I've heard any other version other than the god awful 80's release. If I have heard one with added strings I haven't paid enough attention and not realised.

We don't know for sure if the two acetates differ with the addition of strings without hearing, we are only assuming this is what happened due to the hand written no strings on the acetate of Phil's.

The first one in your list appears to be the same as Joe's copy, no arranger credit, deadwax info EC 5709 A @ 6 O'Clock, upside down circled BA @ 12 O'Clock position. "‹Now if we can get the info for the other three to confirm............

I'm waiting for someone to confirm the one with the arrangers credit whether it is an standard "E" or the E that looks like a backward three as in Joe's photo. Looks like the one without the arrangers credit.

It would appear the deadwax is different with a different font style for the "E" at the beginning of the run out details. One looking more like a backward 3 and the other being an actual "E". The difference we have or rather Joe is his has no arranger details yet the "E" looks like a backward 3.

Doesn't John have the info for arranger/no arranger the opposite way round to what we have here?

I have a Deon Jackson "That's What You Do To Me" somewhere. A mate has loads including some for records considered rare nowadays. I also have some templates somewhere if you want to type your own out.

It's the 80's release though isn't it, flip side to "The. World Is X Rated", one with synthesiser overdubs, totally ruined.

Think so but I lost my internet signal briefly and only caught a bit as I got back on line, perils of being on the move I guess.

Such sad news. R.I.P. Keith.

I've just read on Discogs that the arranger one is a definite E and not a backward 3 like the one without the arranger.

Is the E more like a backward 3?

Hopefully someone will confirm the matrix for the one with the arranger credit but sure they are the same.

Do you mean the first press without arranger credit? this one.... and this is the one with credit for the arranger....

Enjoyed the show Rob and your enthusiasm. What was the first of the three DorÄ— tracks you played?

That's the one

The Complete Fame Singles. Vol 1 - 1964-1967 - New Ace View full article