Jump to content

Modernsoulsucks

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by Modernsoulsucks

  1. Thought it was wrong sided doubled sided demo. See here https://cgi.ebay.com/PATTI-AUSTIN-Day-Day-Mono-soul-vinyl-45-/350465339191?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&hash=item51995caf37 ROD
  2. Much prefer https://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbWpaVJYfTc
  3. https://cgi.ebay.co.uk/CHIP-TYLER-IF-YOU-ASK-ME-CHICORY-/300543640532?pt=UK_Records&hash=item45f9cc03d4 See above. Always thought this record to be difficult to find but it doesn't seem to be held in high regard so value doesn't equate to rarity IMO. Pretty sure I had an issue too back in the 90's which I sold, but I kept the demo. ROD
  4. Yes he re-issued in mid-90's at same time as "Rat Race" ROD
  5. Leaders You are the one I love BLUE ROCK DJ EX £10 LISTEN:https://www.raresoulman.co.uk/d/57254/LEAD Jackie Wilson Haunted House BRUNSWICK M- £20 [real nice unblemished label and vinyl copy] LISTEN:https://www.raresoulman.co.uk/d/68453/WILSON,_JACKIE Ricky Gee Lovely Girl STA-SET EX £20 nice beat ballad] LISTEN:https://www.raresoulman.co.uk/d/73963/GEE,_RICKY Palisades Make the night just.. CHAIRMAN WDJ EX [sticker mark on label] £50 Orig version of Ramona King etc Postage £2.50 for recorded delivery first class. Please PM if interested.
  6. Mine's got "X"'s on too. ROD
  7. I know nothing about the boots at all. Obv. Vernee on the flip is a boot but no idea when. ROD
  8. Patto, can't remember what they look like vinyl-wise etc compared to 70's boot but yes basically looks like the picture you put up. If yours is the 90's repress rather than 70's boot then definite [100%] repress by Gino Washington. ROD
  9. There's also the legal Washpan repress from the mid 90's. ROD
  10. I'd say mine was a Minter [EX definitely] more or less. No marks at all I can see. Not the copy I had in '73 though. Got it in the 90's for nowt really [$40 I think] and hardly played it since. ROD
  11. Tony/Andy, Yes I've got Tamiko issue. Off Soul Bowl. At the time he said he just had a couple. ROD
  12. Kev, Mick [unfortunately] is coming round on Monday. I will ask him about that as he appears never to have forgotten anything to do with records he has owned or seen and more surprisingly anything I've ever had or done which is a bit scarey in a stalker kinda way. Ian, I got a copy of the 45 in March '73 when I swapped it with a guy dj-ing in Hyde, near Stockport. Gave him Lenis Guess and I think Toni Lamarr for it. I remember exactly cos I worked at Global for a month then. ROD
  13. Two posts reference the sales forums on soul source that have been moved from the old blog to the new articles as part of the latest site reorg Record Grading Posted by modernsoulsucks, in sales 04 December 2011 · Here is a start to arrive at something we can agree on. This will not be compulsory but sellers may want to include in their ads something along the lines of "graded as per recommended SS guidelines" . M- As good as it gets, practically an untouched record that plays as if it were brand new store stock VG++The odd barely discernable surface mark or minor blemish, nothing that will affect play in any way. VG+ A few more marks than a VG++ record but still sounds fine for listening and/or DJing. No scratches. A used but far from abused copy. VG Light scuffs and light scratches throughout, most can't be felt. Expect surface wear throughout the record with light surface noise and possibly a few pops. Should still serve as a suitable player copy for listening & DJing despite the moderate noise. VG- The record may have some scratches that will be deep enough to feel. Audible clicks and pops are likely consistent throughout the grooves. Should still play well enough for DJing if you're not a stickler. Expect noticeable noise throughout, NO SKIPS though. G+ A record that has been played and not taken care of. Constant background noise will be present. NO SKIPS but such records are the lowest grade likely to still serve as a cheap filler copy for those in need. Things like WOL, label tears and sticker marks will have to be listed seperately. A coupler of "X"s on a M- record makes no difference IMO whilst someone's name scrawled across the label does. Thoughts? ROD Wants Guidelines Posted by modernsoulsucks, in sales 04 January 2012 Anyone got anything to add to the following? Just a few words to hopefully enable members to get the best out of this feature. Ads, as within Sales, are limited to 2 per day per member with no re-posting within 3 days. If you are posting a couple or more wants please do not split into seperate ads. New members are asked to post an introduction before placing any ads. It is suggested that members are precise in their wording. Asking generally for a want can lead to both set sale and "make me an offer" replies. If members do not wish to make an offer then state clearly in the ad that you are only interested in the item at a set sale price. Rather than a general "Wanted" or "Looking for..." in the Topic Title it is recommended that members give some indication as to artists,labels etc Where replies are received to a want it is only polite to contact all members who have taken the time to respond. An interim reply where you are awaiting further offers to compare prices or to decline the offer. Members can also state what they wish to pay for an item which would cut out having to respond to offers above that price. If members do not want comments to appear within the ad then lock the topic and ask for all responses to be via PM. If the topic is not locked then members are asked to restrict their comments to those which may help to locate the item. Any wider discussion can be accommodated by opening a new topic in LAYB.
  14. Mick, All this all happened to me 2 years go, the people welcomed me into their do's if it had been 30 years ago I would have risked a "duffin up" as I'm Asian. As I remember Steve from Warrington [who I think is a member here] standing in the record bar at Wigan with us some 35 years ago in a state of unduffedness, I think you may have that wrong. ROD
  15. Yes, Little Bob sounds like those Pendulem warm-up records. Pleasant but nowhere near an archetypal Northern record. ROD
  16. Which scan? Not sure of your point. The other side is credited to "Connie Clark and Orchestra" ROD
  17. Modernsoulsucks replied to a post in a topic in Look At Your Box
    Stamped in on "Sidra's Theme" side is ZTSC 121603-1A. Small T1 scratched in ROD
  18. Actually TV175, Bearsy's post reminds me that it might be worth checking with your neighbours. Happened to me not long ago. I live at 10, note left at 8 that 45 was at 2. ROD
  19. Temptations is a different record. I have the feeling though that IAP and Duprees are the same group and maybe the same version. ROD
  20. As everybody is apologising it was I who used "boot" first. I see it's a legal re-issue so sorry about that. Murano has either got a nice £150-200 original or a piece of tat he might get £5 for if he's lucky. The suspense is killing me. ROD
  21. "VIRTUE" scratched in and F-TRO-3 scratched in on "A changed man" side Other side same except F-TRO-2 and LW. Info taken from white promo so definite original 45 is vinyl. Boot may have been styrene. Can't remember now. ROD
  22. Modernsoulsucks replied to a post in a topic in Record Wants
    https://covers33.co.uk/create_account_success.php This too
  23. Re-checked my mate's copy and NO LW on b-side. Does that mean it's a boot even though it has all the markings on A-side. ROD
  24. Yes. Isn't it just something that when it was big it didn't matter whether dj or regular so copies in collections. ROD
  25. The golden rule appears to be if you have a copy it's worth twice it's value and if you haven't it's worth half the value. IMO Brian's at £275 was a very fair price and I reckon £450 would not be at all a surprise. However this 45 tends to be in collections and those who have it wouldn't sell at £275 or £600. Wilxy it's on styrene or brittle plastic anyway [not bendy] and delta # is 58486 with MR [kinda joined up] in circle stamped and J-1 scratched in. ROD

Advert via Google