Mick Holdsworth

Yes, there is a clip of all four songs, here's the link direct ... https://192.185.225.173/~funkyou/2070s.mp3 Cheers Mick

Agreed, it's just too expensive to upgrade. In my case the basic fee would be 35p a listing if I chose to go past 20 a month, so pay more for international exposure is not anything I would consider. Yes, you can search from anywhere for anything, but once someone gets to one of your items, it's the difference between this ... https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/201102890513 ... and this ... https://www.ebay.com/itm/201102890513 Same item, and on the face of it, no difference, but in each case, click "see other items" and the differing results chould speak for themselves. This is what I meant by lack of exposure. Cheers Mick

I've often wondered that. It applies to nearly all the classics. Alexander Patton, Rufus Lumley, Shane Martin, most of the UK Tamla Motown label releases of records that were also released in the US, and tons more. Even some UK second issues like Darrell Banks on 70's Stateside are more prized than US Revilot originals. Maybe they are simply rarer in general, although that is probably a too general statement. Maybe it originates from the original sixties UK based collectors, when US imports were very few and far between, and the first time these were heard by any Soul collector was as a new or newish UK release, and the prestige has just grown from there. Just thoughts, not facts. Cheers Mick

Some of it may be down to exposure, or lack of. This applies to items listed on the UK site, but if you pay the extra fee for international listings, you may get more hits than if you just go for the basic listing, which is not visible though anything but ".co.uk" (international buyers can search for an item worldwide, but once they get to your listing through ".com" and hit "more from this seller" or whatever it's called these days, they won't find anything.

This is the Numero Uno release in the 45 x 45 box set used (nearly) Identical labels, so it's very hard to tell, but it is just about possible to distinguish, just from the image. Original - the Green is slightly lighter, but the giveaway is the text on the left hand side. The "P" in "Produced by" lines up with the middle of the "V" in "VO-003" Reissue - The Green is slightly darker, and for the same piece of text, ... The "P" in "Produced by" lines up with the middle of the "O" in "VO-003" As the description doesn't say one way or another, it is safe to assume it is a Numero Uno copy (although NOT in its original sleeve, as that would be the Numero Uno sleeve) Cheers Mick

The Mel Hayes Instrumental version is much longer on the first release than on the later Boogie Man / RCA releases, coming in at over 4 mins instead of the 3 min versions on the later releases. (In all cases the vocal version is the same, just over 4 mins) I have a Mel Hayes here ... https://northernsoulrecords.com/recordsoriginals.shtm ... about 3 / 4 of the way down the page. Cheers Mick

This is tragic news, and my heart felt condolences go to his family who must be devastated. He will be dearly missed by those who knew him well, and those who only knew him on places like this forum. I hope you are at peace now Mick

I picked up a red issue Sidras Theme in a "Reissues - £5 each or 3 for £10" box at Bretby in the mid 90's - (nearly) all the rest were boots. I had to pay £5.00 as I couldn't find another two records to justify spending another £5.00 ... Showed it to Pep and he went and had a look and came back to me with a Sandy Wynns / Touch Of Venus on black Champion, which I missed completely. Cheers Mick

Dave, It's not Amazon who are producing it, they are just sellers. The blame in this case is Universal, and for the Beatles, EMI, who have done the dirty. Cheers Mick

I think 1966, but would need to check to be sure

Yes, I think you're right. I've just checked my old want lists expecting to see this and it wasn't there, so I must be thinking about something else. Cheers Mick

It is quite rare on US though, as opposed to the European release (Gemany ?? / RCA ?? - something like that but probably neither) which turns up regularly at about £20 / £30.) Don't think I have ever seen a US copy. As to the price, as I have never seen it, I couldn't comment. Cheers Mick

It was issued but withdrawn on UK Brunswick on the "Out Of Sight" soundtrack LP. That's as close to a sixties UK release as you will get. It has a slightly different version with a cold finish. The LP is readily available on US Decca, but quite rare over here on Brunswick, as only a handful of sleeveless copies escaped the pressing plant (much like the Len Barry Lp from the same company) No contemporary 45 exists on any UK label, just the mass of boots / reissues that would follow over the next 45/50 years. Cheers Mick

Here's the link https://www.amazon.co.uk/Motown-7s-Box-VINYL/dp/B00JA0HE0K/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1400756060&sr=1-1&keywords=The+Motown+7s+Box+Set Cheers Mick

Link wasn't working, should be OK at ... https://www.somanyrecordssolittletime.com

Not really relevant to the original question, but thought I'd put this one up. ... and yes, "Why Girl" is on the flip. Cheers Mick

Don't have it now, but I used to have a copy of the one without the catalog number, and it was the same layout both sides, with the big Not For Sale etc. I never realised until now that there was another variation with PR 1. Cheers Mick

The silver text are the originals, but about halfway through the series Pye changed their design to black text (also on their main Pye label too). From that point on, all the DDS were black text, but as some of the earlier ones were then reissued, (Frankie & Classicals, Footsie, Velvets etc.) those fell in line with the all new black text design. I remember seeing those 79/80 grey labels, and I think Footsie was the only DDS that made it to a third release, therefore the only one to get a grey label. As before, the main label also used this grey colour, hence the Jupiter Beyond in the previous post. I think it was a very short lived design though. Cheers Mick

Indeed so - The takes could be identical, the fact that there are different "Q" and "H-LI" reference numbers may be no more than a miniscule change in leveling, and the date could just be the date the labels were typed (eg start on Thursday evening, go home, come back Friday morning and finish yesterdays work off) Cheers Mick

I can't remember if I had a sound file at the time - Been looking and can't find one on this PC, but It could be on another drive somewhere. From what I remember, the two takes on Jan 29 were identical to each other (I was told this, rather than working it out from audio files). As to whether these were different from Jan 28 I can't remember if I ever worked that out. Cheers Mick

Just seeing the recording date for MG / LL, made me think of this. First Mixdown - Jan 28 1965 (Hope you're keeping it safe Phil !!!) Second Mixdown - Jan 29 1965 - (Never had this one, - was in the process of buying this about 5 years ago, it but for some reason the seller just stopped communication in the middle) Would have been nice to have had both side by side. Cheers Mick

Maybe Martha & Vandellas - "I'll Follow You" (from the "Watchout" album, and also on a 6 track EP) Cheers Mick

Thanks for checking. That's interesting, so "Steal Away" seems to have been mastered twice. SM-00360 and then SM-00364 Non of which helps Eddyw of course, but solved my little anomaly. Cheers Mick

I have a test pressing of it, but don't think there will be a white demo, as it was a B side. Aside from that, one thing I have just noticed is the matrix for the "Steal Away" label on its promotion and release says SM 00364. The test press I have has "Steal Away" as SM 00360. The "Friday Night" matrix is unchanged - SM 00361 - making it the same as the printed labels for it's release. I dont have a release so I can't check, but wondered if the "Steal Away" release also has the original SM 00360 matrix in the runout. This would them line up with it being the A side, and promoted as as such, and the demo / release SM 00364 would be a simple typing error. Anyone got one to hand to check ? Cheers Mick

A fair few month ago there was a advert (I'm sure it was also for an airline, but might be mistaken) that used "I Get the Sweetest Feeling". Big deal, you say, except the version used was Erma Franklin, which was a refreshing change from Jackie or some generic male copycat used forever Thinking about it, it was probably about 12 months or more back now. Cheers Mick