Rbman Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 Is it more costly (in general) to collect 60s records than 70s ? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Simon M Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 Is it more costly (in general) to collect 60s records than 70s ? Depends really , 60's r&b is cheap Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Rbman Posted September 15, 2008 Author Share Posted September 15, 2008 Depends really , 60's r&b is cheap thanks for your helpful and considered response Simon... Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Simon M Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 thanks for your helpful and considered response Simon... I would say that genre , would be cheaper than 70's soul Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Steve G Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 70s soul tends to not fetch the same price as 60s at the rare end. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Supercorsa Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 (edited) That would be because everyone knows that all soul records made after 23.59hrs on 31st December 1969 are rubbish! Edited September 15, 2008 by Supercorsa Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!