Jump to content
Posted
  • Popular Post

fyi

*1st Click On The Attached .png To Enlarge!

*Click Once More

*It Will Start In A New Tab

*Click Again To Enlarge

--- --- --- --- ---

*To Download - Right Click On The .png - Save Image As

screencapture-raresoulman-co-uk-auction-soul-auction-soul-auction-ending-this-wednesday-html-2022-04-13-19_00_14.png

  • Replies 13
  • Views 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Most Popular Posts

  • There were dozens of nearly everything years ago .

  • That's forty year ago.  Most records were a fiver in the 70s, you could get virtually owt you wanted for less than a ton in the mid 80s.  You cannot compared then to now.  we see daft prices for recor

  • Tomangoes
    Tomangoes

    That four tracks is a good record but there were dozens for a fiver in the late 70s....inflation gone mad. Ed

Posted Images

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, Tomangoes said:

That four tracks is a good record but there were dozens for a fiver in the late 70s....inflation gone mad.

Ed

There were dozens of nearly everything years ago .

1 hour ago, Tomangoes said:

That four tracks is a good record but there were dozens for a fiver in the late 70s....inflation gone mad.

 

That's forty year ago.  Most records were a fiver in the 70s, you could get virtually owt you wanted for less than a ton in the mid 80s.  You cannot compared then to now.  we see daft prices for records that were a fiver ten years ago.  You have more demand now, different senes for both sides. 

Mathew Barnett I thought cheap, some of the others more or less what they have been selling at set sale give or take.

42 minutes ago, Chalky said:

That's forty year ago.  Most records were a fiver in the 70s, you could get virtually owt you wanted for less than a ton in the mid 80s.  You cannot compared then to now.  we see daft prices for records that were a fiver ten years ago.  You have more demand now, different senes for both sides. 

Mathew Barnett I thought cheap, some of the others more or less what they have been selling at set sale give or take.

The reason the Mathew Barnett was cheap is that a quantity of copies have turned up in mint condition.

10 minutes ago, Wheelsville1 said:

The reason the Mathew Barnett was cheap is that a quantity of copies have turned up in mint condition.

I'd quite like one ... where are they all ??

Andy

 

12 minutes ago, Andy Rix said:

I'd quite like one ... where are they all ??

Andy

 

Se

 

13 minutes ago, Andy Rix said:

I'd quite like one ... where are they all ??

Andy

 

I dont know who has them Andy,but several dealers have had them over the last six months. I think Adey Pierce has one at the moment for £300. 

4 minutes ago, Wheelsville1 said:

Se

 

I dont know who has them Andy,but several dealers have had them over the last six months. I think Adey Pierce has one at the moment for £300. 

I have just looked on his website and he still has it £300 m- condition. 

6 minutes ago, Wheelsville1 said:

I have just looked on his website and he still has it £300 m- condition. 

Wonder if he would accept £225 !!!!

3 minutes ago, Andy Rix said:

Wonder if he would accept £225 !!!!

You could ask him,he has had it for a while.I know Pat Brady had one last year in the same condition but i cant remember how much it was.

Crazy price for Jay D. Martin, but didn't JM get even more for it last time he auctioned it? Might be wrong, but think it went for over £1300.

Sparkels wasn't in great condition, so an m- copy would have probably gone for near double that, as it has previously.                                                              

Get involved with Soul Source