Pete S Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 (edited) Blatant or wot? Naughty naughty (link) Edited April 26, 2005 by Pete-S Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Baz Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Blatant or wot? Naughty naughty (link) link tut tut could be liable selling it on ebay Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Simsy Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 tut tut could be liable selling it on ebay link £10 buy it now + £2.50 p&p. Naughty chancer Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Simsy Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 (edited) Blatant or wot? Naughty naughty (link) link Don't be surprised if this gets pulled, guideline - links to open bootlegs etc Edited April 26, 2005 by Ian Sims Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Bigsoulman Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Don't be surprised if this gets pulled, guideline - links to open bootlegs etc link Yeah and ebay still won't do f*** all about it! Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Geordiejohnson Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Tut Tut.... what cheap stunt will they do next...maybe...acetates Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Bigsoulman Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Tut Tut.... what cheap stunt will they do next...maybe...acetates link OOOOH you are naughty!!! Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Baz Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Tut Tut.... what cheap stunt will they do next...maybe...acetates link Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Pete S Posted April 26, 2005 Author Share Posted April 26, 2005 Tut Tut.... what cheap stunt will they do next...maybe...acetates link Ha fucking ha. Bit different cutting one side of a record unavailable anywhere than copying over 1000 tracks which you can by legitimitely from your local record shop. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
vaultofsouler Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Ha fucking ha. Bit different cutting one side of a record unavailable anywhere than copying over 1000 tracks which you can by legitimitely from your local record shop. link .... upset Pete ???? .... Seriously though.... I know you've done it mate.... BUT IS IT DIFFERENT ????.... I'd say NO as I would argue that the "unavailable" bit (not sure about the "anywhere" part on some stuff done) is what this "rare soul" scene is about with some tunes, always has been and always will.... making stuff "readily available" is no different than jumping into Dr Who's Tardis and going "back in the day" when Soussan and the like did the same.... yes people may be more "up front" now when selling by saying that the tunes are "re-issues/boots/etc." but still wouldn't agree it's different.... but if there's a market then each to their own I suppose .... Also, the "x" ammount of tracks on a DVD is only the next step I'd say.... again, if there's a market "someone" will find it and go for it.... Just all in my humble opinion of course .... Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Pete S Posted April 27, 2005 Author Share Posted April 27, 2005 Hold up. So if someone rings me up and says can you do so and so on a single and I do it - thats the same as taking all the product from kent, Goldmine and whatever and advertising it on Ebay is it? Enough, I've got a load to do today and can't be bothered arguing. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts