- Replies 26
- Views 2.8k
- Created
- Last Reply
Most active in this topic
-
Robbk 6 posts
-
Premium Stuff 4 posts
-
Roburt 2 posts
Most Popular Posts
-
I'm pretty sure I've talked about this before...vanity recording is not meant to be derogatory as vanity is commonly used. Back in the 1960s, most decent sized cities had rec
-
Gospel groups / singers would tour all over the US playing gigs in local black churches. They would be 'paid' for these shows and usually 'put up' / fed in the homes of members of each ch
-
Wasn't Nabay a vanity record?
Hi everyone
The current thread on Margaret Little got me thinking about so-called 'vanity recordings'.
I guess 'vanity recordings' probably fall into two categories:
1) Person sets up own label to release own song for 'vanity' purposes.
2) Another person releases someone else's recording for that other person's 'vanity' purposes.
In general 'vanity recording' seems to be a derogatory term - the person can't sing, or has a bad song, but has enough money or the 'right' contacts so they can still put out a record.
Here is an example of what I think is a 'vanity' release.
Ray Bailey owned Bailey Records in Detroit - best known for a much better release by Gino Johnson. However, this one is pretty much rubbish - but then, it was his own label
Got any others Soulsourcers?
Cheers
Richard
Ray Bailey & United Five - Hollywood Part 1 (Bailey 8109 A)
https://soundcloud.com/user1502162/ray-bailey-united-five
Edited by Premium Stuff