Jump to content
Posted

Any copies of wake up to the sunshine out their

  • Replies 24
  • Views 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Most Popular Posts

  •   I never realised so many people had such bad taste   I blame the drugs

  • £500 is a great price for it,however a mint copy only achieved £900 on jm's last year,but it certainly isnt a record thats worth over a grand anyway i reckon.

  •   it has a 1973 date on it, which i suspect is a reissue of sorts..even if it has the labels correctly applied...

Posted Images

Featured Replies

bargain at £500 for a NM copy !! surprised it's still there !!

 

yeah..but the label colour looks a bit like the boot...

yeah..but the label colour looks a bit like the boot...

can't see that being right at that money 

£500 is a great price for it,however a mint copy only achieved £900 on jm's last year,but it certainly isnt a record thats worth over a grand anyway i reckon.

£500 is a great price for it,however a mint copy only achieved £900 on jm's last year,but it certainly isnt a record thats worth over a grand anyway i reckon.

 

it has a 1973 date on it, which i suspect is a reissue of sorts..even if it has the labels correctly applied...

The one sold by JM last December had the year 1973 on it.

yep my mistake..i guess you'd have to compare the matrix etc..

Not sure you guys are aware,but it's no good studying the label on discogs, as they don't allow you to upload your own,but choose from thier own database.

Seller clearly states labels are correct way round unlike boots which are reversed.

Also think seller is or was on here and actually asked for the details a yr or so back, before posting his sale up..

Yep,it's been there for ages and made me chuckle when the last copy was on J.M's auction.

Some people really don't bother to look and prefer to chuck their money away lol

First one gets it.........!

Not sure you guys are aware,but it's no good studying the label on discogs, as they don't allow you to upload your own,but choose from thier own database.

Seller clearly states labels are correct way round unlike boots which are reversed.

Also think seller is or was on here and actually asked for the details a yr or so back, before posting his sale up..

Yep,it's been there for ages and made me chuckle when the last copy was on J.M's auction.

Some people really don't bother to look and prefer to chuck their money away lol

First one gets it.........!

 

When you enter a record onto the Discogs database you are asked to add a photo of the label..

When you enter a record onto the Discogs database you are asked to add a photo of the label..

Ok Pete, but I've noticed if I go on discogs market place. Punch in a artist and title,it brings up the list of records and from what I've seen, they use the same photo, no matter which seller I choose.

So maybe if it's already on there in the database, some people aren't uploading their own?

Either way, the guy has posted up matrix numbers and relevant detail to try to clarify original v boot.

Reversed labels etc

Ok Pete, but I've noticed if I go on discogs market place. Punch in a artist and title,it brings up the list of records and from what I've seen, they use the same photo, no matter which seller I choose.

So maybe if it's already on there in the database, some people aren't uploading their own?

Either way, the guy has posted up matrix numbers and relevant detail to try to clarify original v boot.

Reversed labels etc

 

That is spot on Nev, if you have a look at that link that I posted today of my own collection, absolutely none of them are my photos

https://www.discogs.com/user/pete.smith/collection

 

but at least it's a good way of monitoring what I've got

That is spot on Nev, if you have a look at that link that I posted today of my own collection, absolutely none of them are my photos

https://www.discogs.com/user/pete.smith/collection

 

but at least it's a good way of monitoring what I've got

Upon checking the link earlier ,pointing out the copy on discogs,it has now gone ,so let's hope the original poster got it and not some other unscrupulous member eh :(

The one sold by JM last December had the year 1973 on it.

It is a sixties recording but didn't see a release until 1973....who in their right mind decided to release this I don't know.  Obviously had a hearing problem.

It is a sixties recording but didn't see a release until 1973....who in their right mind decided to release this I don't know.  Obviously had a hearing problem.

but a floorpacker everywhere,,,even the Dome!

but a floorpacker everywhere,,,even the Dome!

 

I never realised so many people had such bad taste :lol:

 

I blame the drugs :lol:

told my mate about it and he bought it on the spot as it was cheap, don't know where the seller got the only 5 copies bit from as there must be a lot more original ones out there

It is a sixties recording but didn't see a release until 1973....who in their right mind decided to release this I don't know.  Obviously had a hearing problem.

 

There was a thread about it a few years ago. From what I recall, 70s recording done in New Mexico after Valvano moved there.

 

I still love it. great tune.

mine had 73 on too, one of the first of about 4 around back in 2000. off the finder