- Replies 12
- Views 1.4k
- Created
- Last Reply
Most active in this topic
-
Autumnstoned 2 posts
-
Roburt 2 posts
-
Neil Austin 2 posts
-
Shinehead 1 post
Most Popular Posts
-
Lots of prog rock & blues rock acts in the 70's would extend their recordings when on stage. They'd add in solo's by some / all the members of the band; a rock guitar break, a drum break, etc. so
-
When I have been to see live acts and I have seen many , I have never expected a exact duplicate of the recorded songs and mostly I have never been disappointed, I think to see your idols in the flesh
-
It's pretty hard for any artist or band to replicate the studio on stage. I've seen some who were extremely good on stage with some very close to the studio.
CHANGING THE SUBJECT A LITTLE ... On the other 'busy' topic it was stated that only the original artists performing their studio recordings in the same way that they were originally recorded is acceptable on the NS scene.
No singers / acts doing covers of those songs or orchestras having a go with guest singers.
BUT BACK IN THE DAY, no act performed their hits / studio tracks as they were recorded ... they upped the energy level to add to the excitement of the show ... an example from RSG ..
In addition to the tempo change; visiting acts (apart from the Motown & Stax packages) had to accept UK backing bands. So once again, their performances were much different to their studio work. Lots of soul folk don't like the LIVE albums released on visiting soul acts (Garnett Mimms, Major Lance, etc) coz of this.
Lots of backing bands were quite inexperienced/ far from top class musicians (Roy Tempest's backing bands for instance, whereas some visiting acts were better served (Mary Wells having Sounds Incorporated as her band on the Beatles tour she did here -- she also brought a Motown guitarist with her to lead them).