Styrene Vs Vinyl
I see a lot of records get released both on styrene and vinyl. Besides the styrene being more brittle (prone to crack), is there a noticeable sound quality difference between the two? Styrene more noisy w less frequency range?
General opinion is that Vinyl is the better of the 2 less prone to cracking and does not deteriorate like styrene!! as styrene loses fidelity/quality whilst just sat in storage due to it's chemical make up!! Atb John.
I'VE HAD 2 OF THOSE! OH YES! WE'VE ALL HEARD DUCKS FART IN THE LONG GRASS BEFORE!!
I would always go for the Vinyl copy for longevity purposes
I've owned Mint styrene records for over 30 years and they're still Mint. In fact I much prefer, and collect, the Motown styrene Map design demo presses over the boring vinyl ones.
The ELEVENTH Annual International Hitsville Rare Soul Weekender - Mojacar, Spain. 17 - 21 SEPTEMBER 2015.
4 Days and Nights of Vinyl Mayhem!
" take a strole through your mind youll be supprised what you might find "
In my experience when styrene 45s are mint/brand new they sound louder/better with less background noise than the vinyl eqivalent, alas this doesn't last & they are a real minefield to buy used because of cueburn/greying/distortion.
I would agree , it only takes one over weighted DJ stylus to damage the surface for ever , but vinyl seems to have a longer life even if canned with pennys stuck on the stylus
I agree. Mint styrene has far less surface noise, higher consistency, better bass response and high-end frequencies.
a lot of vinyl was often recycled hence the sometimes poor quality recordings and the vinyl stampers deteriorate more quickly. Mint (or near as) styrene is always a better quality sound.
But it's brittle and can easily wear.
Having said that, vinyl is very good at most plants today, especially in Europe.
A particularly bad period for vinyl in the US was the mid 1970s when many plants used regrade materials because of increased vinyl costs following the oil embargo. It was made even worse when some plants ran stampers until they were worn, rather than replace them every 1000 pressings.
I suppose they thought of records as disposable products to be replaced when worn out.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users