Jump to content
  • Sign Up
dobber

Emanuel Laskey-Dont Lead Me On-Mix Question?

Recommended Posts

hi all

what is the musical difference beteen the 2 mixes/versions,and how can one tell the difference with both copys (label/run out info)?

also, which mix is rarer, and does it affect the value?

thanks

Edited by dobber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where are all the Detroit experts? 

 

I have the regional "hit" (charted) version.  It is by FAR the most common.  The alternate version is very rare, and should be worth more, despite being less likeable (at least to me on a personal level).  In the trail mijn has the following:   ZTSC 97699  etched, and "Bell Sound" is stamped.  There is also a small insignia stamp made from 3 letters superimposed on each other.  One is a capital "H". and one is a capital "L".  I can't make out the 3rd letter.  That insignia ts to the right of "Bell Sound: and the entire writing in the trail runs counter-clockwise - the opposite direction from that of the writing on the label.  On the other side of  the ZTSC engraving (before it) is one letter or a  couple superimposed letters scratched out and unreadable.

 

I bought this in 1964 in a record shop in Detroit. 

 

The other mix has different emphasis on the background vs. vocal, and I think the strings and horns are different takes.  I can't really remember, but I like it less, and think the "hit" radio-played version is much tighter.

Edited by RobbK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK like RobbK described it both have the same "original" matrix. The one he described and defined is the most common one. It is sung by Emmanuel Laskey. Even though I also have this very record, the first one I've had before getting the other one, it always bugged me how the mastering seemed "faulty". The whole backing track is on the highs only and there's no bass to give it some "body". Like you only get one channel or half of the backing track. I'm sure something went wrong at the mastering and/or the recording stage. And when I heard the "scratched out matrix" copy with full horns and b"r"ass mix, I was reassured to finally hear that great song with a good sound. Then, Emmanuel Laskey is not there anymore since it is Billy Kennedy singing instead. I love Billy Kennedy, but I really love love Emmanuel Laskey so I kept both copies...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK like RobbK described it both have the same "original" matrix. The one he described and defined is the most common one. It is sung by Emmanuel Laskey. Even though I also have this very record, the first one I've had before getting the other one, it always bugged me how the mastering seemed "faulty". The whole backing track is on the highs only and there's no bass to give it some "body". Like you only get one channel or half of the backing track. I'm sure something went wrong at the mastering and/or the recording stage. And when I heard the "scratched out matrix" copy with full horns and b"r"ass mix, I was reassured to finally hear that great song with a good sound. Then, Emmanuel Laskey is not there anymore since it is Billy Kennedy singing instead. I love Billy Kennedy, but I really love love Emmanuel Laskey so I kept both copies...

 

think you're getting a bit confused, there are 2 originals of this by emanuel laskey , bell sound stamp (the one rob described)  and the rarer nashville matrix stamp,  the billy kennedy (credited to emanuel laskey)  is a 1990's pressing cut from unreleased master tapes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looked at mine.

Nashville stamp and on B 97699 scratched out and 97700 in.

Which one is that then ?

Sounds kinda like what I remember it sounded like !

What's difference with the other one ?

ROD

Rod...both are credited to Emauel Laskey on the label...the one you have is Emauel Laskey....the other one "Bell sound" stamped is reportedly Billy Kennedy and the vocal is slightly different also the "bell sound" stamped has a slightly different start, there is no girly backing at the start before thesis vocal comes in.

Unless you played the 2 next to each other most folk wouldn't notice as they are both great.

The "Bell sound" stamped one is twice as hard to track down as the "Nashville matrix" one.

Andy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm lost - unless I'm reading it wrong

 

One person is saying the Nashville matrix copy is the rarer - another person is saying the Bell Sound copy is the rare one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

think you're getting a bit confused, there are 2 originals of this by emanuel laskey , bell sound stamp (the one rob described)  and the rarer nashville matrix stamp,  the billy kennedy (credited to emanuel laskey)  is a 1990's pressing cut from unreleased master tapes

 

:thumbsup:  Both are 106, Bell Sound mix tougher than Nasville Matrix mix.

 

The EL that is reputed to be Billy Kennedy is Thelma 115 (I think).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumbsup:  Both are 106, Bell Sound mix tougher than Nasville Matrix mix.

 

The EL that is reputed to be Billy Kennedy is Thelma 115 (I think).

This is correct.  Thelma 115 is a bootleg of the previously unreleased Thelma recordings.  It was made in the 1990s.    My original Thelma 106 has Bell sound, and is Emanuel Laskey (Lasky).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is really confusing me. Mine has nothing scratched out.

Don't Lead Me On. ZTSC 97700 and Bell Stamp.

What Did I Do Wrong. ZTSC 97699 and Bell stamp.

 

Is this first or second mix?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Noggin said:

This is really confusing me. Mine has nothing scratched out.

Don't Lead Me On. ZTSC 97700 and Bell Stamp.

What Did I Do Wrong. ZTSC 97699 and Bell stamp.

 

Is this first or second mix?

 

 

It's not really a matter of first or second "mix" but rather of 'take'. Likely because of a mix/master mistake during the recording session provoking a confusion during the release or such kind of story. 

The first pressed copies that are more commonly found are the non-scratched out matrix and have a mix/mastering issue as there is no bass channel giving it a "brittle" thin/sharp sound but maybe to an effect of slickness... to some ears at least.

Then you have the less common scratched out matrix copies which are clearly another cut since even Emmanuel Laskey's singing differs and here the mix/master channels are clearly balanced with bass and full horns to give the tune BODY !

Finally, and I got rightfully called-off above, the unissued later released version of Billy Kennedy...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Noggin said:

Thanks for the info 👍

I will ask my friend to whom I sold my ex-copy without the scratched-out matrix to bring it along next time he'll come over my place and do an mp3 of it with my now scratched-out matrix copy and post it on here so you can compare both versions from there and find out for yourself where to take it. I made my choice :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  Sign up/in to remove

Nope, top one one is the previously unissued one credited to Emanuel Lasky on 45 but is actually Billy Kennedy. Second YT clip is the scratched-out matrix ! My mate with the "thin" mix has too much hassle with work, wages and making ends meet, like the other half do, that he didn't find the time yet to drop by... I will keep you posted with a real recordings of both sounding better than these for a real comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Noggin said:

Mine doesn't have the scratched out matrix but,(to my ears anyway), sounds just like the second YT clip above.

Mine sounds like the bottom one, but have to dig it out to check the deadwax...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comment now!

Comments are members only

Sign Up

Join Soul Source - Free & easy!

Sign up now!

Sign in

Sign in here.

Sign in now!

Adverts



×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.