I have just seen this for sale on ebay in with a lot of boots and look a likes , and its getting some serious bids , is it a real copy or a clever repro ? item 270214497240 thanks , franky m

I have just seen this for sale on ebay in with a lot of boots and look a likes , and its getting some serious bids , is it a real copy or a clever repro ? item 270214497240 thanks , franky m

wouldnt buy it myself with that date stamp

asked the seller what colour it was when held up to the light.....answer brown

.....answer brown

Oh dear! sounds like an expensive bootleg. If I remember rightly the original has an 'AR' stamped in the deadwax inside a circle. cant remember the delta number though.

A

looking at the other stuff he is selling its almost certainly a boot the circle with the A and a swiggle in the runout grooves must be pressed in the boots are scratched

Think Manship sold a brown vinyl one for £200. And have heard of another sold for a grand, crackers.

The seller is not even stating he is selling boots/repros these bidders really need to be told

heres the e-bay link not sure about this one, ,

https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...3D200%26fvi%3D1

it's a defo size 9

I have a brown vinyl (when held up to the light) one bought many years ago (£15) without that date stamp on the label. My mate Ian has one with the date stamp on the label bought more recently.

Can anyone tell me which came first, the date stamped one or no stamp?

The brown vinyl (when held up to the light) ones' which have sold for expensive amounts have NOT had the label stamp on them.

Mine has superb sound tone and label is quality too. They must be tough to find?

I have a brown vinyl (when held up to the light) one bought many years ago (£15) without that date stamp on the label. My mate Ian has one with the date stamp on the label bought more recently.

Can anyone tell me which came first, the date stamped one or no stamp?

The brown vinyl (when held up to the light) ones' which have sold for expensive amounts have NOT had the label stamp on them.

Mine has superb sound tone and label is quality too. They must be tough to find?

yeh but 100+ its a F***** joke

yeh but 100+ its a F***** joke

The worlds gone F***IN MAD

look at his other sale items on e-bay he has lots of bootlegs and no mention of the fact that they are,!!!!,

The date stamp seems remarkably fresh for 1967.

Derek

Defo a boot, got a record of him the other week and it was a boot, sold it as an original.

Quality of J&TW is bad it has crackles and pops not on the record but from the original record at the end and beginning.

The date stamp seems remarkably fresh for 1967.

Derek

I have very few US records that have date stamps on them like that, in fact probably hardly any. Some have a date scribbled in normally in rushed handwriting. Love the way someone has done the X X grafitti to make it look like a plug side too Fools and their money etc....

For a long time this was in my book one of the moest expensive bootlegs that ever went thru ebay as it once went for the unbelievable sum of 260 UKP on ebay several years ago

Latest bid now just £16.01. Top-dollar bids have been withdrawn 'after seller changed description'!

Brian

I was one of the of those, dunno why i did not question it more really, but there you go.. a boot, and I'm out.

Mal.C.

I have a brown vinyl (when held up to the light) one bought many years ago (£15) without that date stamp on the label. My mate Ian has one with the date stamp on the label bought more recently.

Can anyone tell me which came first, the date stamped one or no stamp?

The brown vinyl (when held up to the light) ones' which have sold for expensive amounts have NOT had the label stamp on them.

Mine has superb sound tone and label is quality too. They must be tough to find?

they were done at the same time, just a few stamped with date, mate who did them is on here but dunno if he reads much. There's an old discussion about this boot and the story behind them.