Imperial C's Bootlegged?

[Marc Forrest]

can I check this then ?

stamped initials L W are in the dead wax , but on mine at about ' 25-30 mins past '

*************************************

This real ?

Many thanks .

ricticman

Yes it is. All originals should also carry sort of a stamped name in the dead wax next to the release number...it was far too small for me to read though

[Chalky]

but did she not rerelease this her self? thats what I was led to believe, so its ligit, in a funny kind of way, but not a boot, do I make sense. only asking!!

yes she did do them herself. So technically a re-issue.

[Chalky]

Yep not hard for the willing would be bootlegger...

they are both real aren't they Ian? If memory serves me the re-issue has some figure or summat on the right and licensed from or words to that effect round the edge on the right.

Edited July 25, 2007 by chalky

[vaultofsouler]

they are both real aren't they Ian? If memory serves me the re-issue has some figure or summat on the right and licensed from or words to that effect round the edge on the right.

Correct of both counts Chalky....

[mrs soul]

yes she did do them herself. So technically a re-issue.

cheers chalky, for a momment I thought I had put my foot init, and can I ask about the belg bloke, selling reproductions, that Ian mentioned, is it him that had the sparkels for sale yesterday?

[Simsy]

they are both real aren't they Ian?

Yep, as Mark said. Both legit.