Jump to content
Posted

  your thoughts on the 2 takes of this !

I like  the more slower soulful version on the 2149-S issue,  than the faster version they play out in the clubs

cheers

sammy

Edited by sammy seaman

  • Replies 17
  • Views 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Sebastian
    Sebastian

    Exact same tempo on both, same recordings, vocal take etc. Just different mix/production. You can tell by the different "master" numbers on the label. 2149-S = "early, different, hollow soun

  • Sammy mine is the U.K issue.I guess that is the faster take.I prefere to hear the faster one played out as its better for the dancers, but as you say the slower take has more soul and is nice to hear

  • Sjclement
    Sjclement

    Just waded through the Jessie Fisher thread and still no wiser  Is this going to be a regular thing ?

Posted Images

Featured Replies

Sammy mine is the U.K issue.I guess that is the faster take.I prefere to hear the faster one played out as its better for the dancers, but as you say the slower take has more soul and is nice to hear at home

Just waded through the Jessie Fisher thread and still no wiser  Is this going to be a regular thing ?

Didn't Mr L get him onto Terry Wogan when it was remixed and reissued - he certainly appeared under another name on there?

Dx

7 hours ago, smudger said:

 

Thanks Smudger!

:thumbsup:

EDIT - almost forgot, always loved this record.

Edited by Peter99

Is anyone else having trouble trying to hear the 2149 version? If I try to listen to it here or on you tube, I get an error 

message saying "This video content from SME, who blocked it in your country on copyright grounds".

  I (obviously) live in the U.S. and the 2149 version appears on the U.S. promo so why is it "blocked" ??

11 minutes ago, the yank said:

Is anyone else having trouble trying to hear the 2149 version? If I try to listen to it here or on you tube, I get an error 

message saying "This video content from SME, who blocked it in your country on copyright grounds".

  I (obviously) live in the U.S. and the 2149 version appears on the U.S. promo so why is it "blocked" ??

All good here mate.

:thumbsup:

is one slower than the other? can hear a different mix but played them simultaneously and seemed the same tempo to me.

Also, were both versions actually released ?- the clips compare demo with issue.  And if both released how can I tell?

10 hours ago, Mike Lofthouse said:

is one slower than the other? can hear a different mix but played them simultaneously and seemed the same tempo to me.

 

Exact same tempo on both, same recordings, vocal take etc. Just different mix/production.

You can tell by the different "master" numbers on the label.

2149-S = "early, different, hollow sounding mix"
MP3: https://paperstax.net/bay/clips/0516-SF45-215.mp3

2172-S = "corrected, meaty sounding, usual play-out take"
MP3: https://soundflies.puresoulie.com/jeffperry - lovedontcomenostonger.mp3

 

Here's the four US variations

2149-S (Demo) jeffperry-2149-demo1.jpg

2149-S- (Issue) jeffperry-2149-issue.jpg

2172-S (Demo) jeffperry-2172-demo.jpg

These images are typical, as there are multiple variations of these first three (different layouts, demos with coloured logo and black logo etc.). However, I could only find this single scan of a 2172-S Issue (there may, of course, be others).

2172-S (Issue) jeffperry-2172-issue.jpg

Cheers
Mick

Hi The Yank,

I am getting blocked SME on both plays , here in Malaga.,Spain . But can play the Tony Stone version on Ensign a German smoothie (on you tube and Discogs at 3.50 euros or £350 after Thursdays brexit ..?) Copyright restrictions apply to mobile and tablet plays the way this thread is going I will certainly need the latter, have a great day LOL ,Johnny.

Not wanting to say anything that's not been said before, but this was discussed on here over two years ago in 2014, what's more - Peter, who said he didn't know there were two takes, was involved in that very thread! :D

Here's the link:

 

5 minutes ago, John Benson said:

Not wanting to say anything that's not been said before, but this was discussed on here over two years ago in 2014, what's more - Peter, who said he didn't know there were two takes, was involved in that very thread! :D

Here's the link:

 

:lol: LOL

I'm such an arse! I don't even know what I know! 

Nice one John

:hatsoff2:

Edited by Peter99

On 21/06/2016 at 08:34, Sebastian said:

 

Exact same tempo on both, same recordings, vocal take etc. Just different mix/production.

You can tell by the different "master" numbers on the label.

2149-S = "early, different, hollow sounding mix"
MP3: https://paperstax.net/bay/clips/0516-SF45-215.mp3

2172-S = "corrected, meaty sounding, usual play-out take"
MP3: https://soundflies.puresoulie.com/jeffperry - lovedontcomenostonger.mp3

 

my copy has the 2172-s label but plays the different mix... having listened again the vocal seems to be different in places

Get involved with Soul Source