Eddie Hubbard Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Does anyone on here know what the group line up of The Sandpipers were , who cut " Lonely too long " on Giant ? And any other interesting info on the group ? Many thanks ,Eddie Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Sean Hampsey Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 I always thought this record sounded like The Bachelors, Eddie. Nice Mike Terry backing track, but shocking vocally. I just accepted that they were the White 'easy listening' trio (Jim Brady, Mike Piano, and Richard Shoff) from LA. If not... it sure sounds like 'em! Sean Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Baz Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 This is there best, far superiour to the mersy beat thing on giant sound file to follow Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Baz Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Young generation - sandpipers - k 13043 refosoul Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Sean Hampsey Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Young generation - sandpipers - k 13043 refosoul So where is that from Baz? Label etc? There were at least 3 groups named the Sandpipers, recording in the 60's. 1 The LA Male Trio (3 x M) plus later (3 x M 1 x F) 2 The S. African group (2 x M, 2 X F) 3 The Florida Trio (3 x F) 4. The 'Giant' artists? Sorry Eddie, I guess you already know the above, which is why you asked for confirmation, but I'm now not sure. Just always thought it was the same crowd as the "Guantanamera" bunch! Sean Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Baz Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 So where is that from Baz? Label etc? There were at least 3 groups named the Sandpipers, recording in the 60's. 1 The LA Male Trio (3 x M) plus later (3 x M 1 x F) 2 The S. African group (2 x M, 2 X F) 3 The Florida Trio (3 x F) 4. The 'Giant' artists? Sorry Eddie, I guess you already know the above, which is why you asked for confirmation, but I'm now not sure. Just always thought it was the same crowd as the "Guantanamera" bunch! Sean I always had an inkling it was a differnt group, but listed in manships under the same as the Giant ones so sort of persumed it was the same. Its on Kismet part of the Kama Sutra lable, not sure where its from? Credits Wrote by Cliff Adams Arranged by Trade Martin Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Eddie Hubbard Posted January 1, 2007 Author Share Posted January 1, 2007 I always thought this record sounded like The Bachelors, Eddie. Nice Mike Terry backing track, but shocking vocally. I just accepted that they were the White 'easy listening' trio (Jim Brady, Mike Piano, and Richard Shoff) from LA. If not... it sure sounds like 'em! Sean Yeah I think it's awful Sean , but I'm doing this Pied Piper article and thought I should mention it ,Thanks everyone so far ......... Best ,Eddie Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Sean Hampsey Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Yeah I think it's awful Sean , but I'm doing this Pied Piper article and thought I should mention it ,Thanks everyone so far ......... Best ,Eddie Didn't think it was your cuppa rosy mate! Looking forward to seeing this Pied piper article you're doing though. You've certainly been putting some work into it. Hope someone can confirm the Sandpipers question for you. Cheers for now. Sean Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Jumpinjoan Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Seen this on a link just posted up on the Hana Barbara thread... might be some of use to you... if only for elimination purposes! https://www.spectropop.com/Sandpipers/index.htm Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Chalky Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 So where is that from Baz? Label etc? There were at least 3 groups named the Sandpipers, recording in the 60's. 1 The LA Male Trio (3 x M) plus later (3 x M 1 x F) 2 The S. African group (2 x M, 2 X F) 3 The Florida Trio (3 x F) 4. The 'Giant' artists? Sorry Eddie, I guess you already know the above, which is why you asked for confirmation, but I'm now not sure. Just always thought it was the same crowd as the "Guantanamera" bunch! Sean I always had an inkling it was a differnt group, but listed in manships under the same as the Giant ones so sort of persumed it was the same. Its on Kismet part of the Kama Sutra lable, not sure where its from? Credits Wrote by Cliff Adams Arranged by Trade Martin Pretty sure the Kismet one has female member and different to the Giant group. Flip it over Baz to check. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Baz Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Pretty sure the Kismet one has female member and different to the Giant group. Flip it over Baz to check. Yeah deffo female on vocals in 'young' other side is called Ali Baba seem to remember it being quite good actually Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Chalky Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Yeah deffo female on vocals in 'young' other side is called Ali Baba seem to remember it being quite good actually isn't Ali Baba the top side? been long time since I had a copy.... Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Chalky Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 If you think the finished versiuon of Lonely Too Long is bad listen to the unissued alt take coming up dunno where it came from, just found it on hard drive whilst browsing for Sandpipers tracks..... Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Chalky Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Lonely Too Long - sandpipers - giant unissued alt take 13047 refosoul Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Eddie Hubbard Posted January 3, 2007 Author Share Posted January 3, 2007 Lonely Too Long - sandpipers - giant unissued alt take 13047 refosoul Cheers for that Chalky , that's horrible isn't it? :-) !! Best ,Eddie Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 (edited) Baz, "manships under the same as the Giant ones so sort of persumed it was the same" We DON'T list different groups with the SAME NAME separtely because the book is a PRICE GUICE not a DISCOGRAPHY. Edition FOUR is 530 pages long and darn heavy to mail. If we started listing different bands with the same name, separately it would become more like 630 pages thick and even more costly to mail. Although we would love to list groups and artists separately we figure the Guide would outgrow itself..and become to thick to comfortably handle. I think you'll find The Sandpipers are a Detroit group and have a tenuous connections to Rare Earth. I'm sure someone we know more andadd to that. www.raresoulman.co.uk Edited January 3, 2007 by john manship Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Martint Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 the alt version was sold on ebay a few years back, IIRC Benji from Germany bought it. Have to say I love both versions (the alt as a pure pop disc of course, but I love the overall sound on the issued version) and I would have plumped for the alt one for my collection had it not had such bad background hiss. So sue me. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Gene-R Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 the alt version was sold on ebay a few years back, IIRC Benji from Germany bought it. Have to say I love both versions (the alt as a pure pop disc of course, but I love the overall sound on the issued version) and I would have plumped for the alt one for my collection had it not had such bad background hiss. So sue me. Mike Terry couldn't put a foot wrong in whatever he had involvement with IMO! Agree with Martin - I've always loved it. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Larsc Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 (edited) We DON'T list different groups with the SAME NAME separtely because the book is a PRICE GUICE not a DISCOGRAPHY. Edition FOUR is 530 pages long and darn heavy to mail. If we started listing different bands with the same name, separately it would become more like 630 pages thick and even more costly to mail. Although we would love to list groups and artists separately we figure the Guide would outgrow itself..and become to thick to comfortably handle. True. But it wouldn't need to be bigger, different groups could be separated like this: Sandpipers..................(1) a nice song/another nice song ..................................(1) a very nice song/a not so nice song ..................................(2) killer tune/rare as rocking horse doo-doo This way it would be easy to separate them. It would need more editing than the present versions though... Edited January 3, 2007 by LarsC Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Geoff Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 First time I heard this was at Soul In The City when it was at the Old Blue Last in Great Eastern Street, heard so many tracks that were new to me, a total revelation. I always like to hear this one, so if you can put it in your playbox Martin and play it for me, you would have at least one happy customer on Wednesday. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Dan Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 i've got several copies of this, all m with one ex, so if anyone wants one PM me with an offer Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!