Jump to content
Posted

Sorry to be a pain creating new thread, quick one, Little Ann Who Are You Trying To Fool on kent, unreleased was it? so kent legit? thanks .

  • Replies 28
  • Views 6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Ady Croasdell
    Ady Croasdell

    It only ever existed on a 1/4" tape and we had some problems getting a good sound out of it in the 90s, however technology and experience have moved on and we're doing a re-copy and EQ for the Cleetho

  • Original
    Original

    Thank you for the confirmation, I agree that it is not too important but i only like to collect originals Sad i know ! Thank you

  • she was amazing @ cleethorpes & so humble.

Posted Images

Featured Replies

It only ever existed on a 1/4" tape and we had some problems getting a good sound out of it in the 90s, however technology and experience have moved on and we're doing a re-copy and EQ for the Cleethorpes 20th CD which should see noticeably improved sound.

Interest in Little Ann hasn't been so high for ten years or more, and it's all down to that man Gilly! (and Dave Hamilton of course)

she was amazing @ cleethorpes & so humble.

It only ever existed on a 1/4" tape and we had some problems getting a good sound out of it in the 90s, however technology and experience have moved on and we're doing a re-copy and EQ for the Cleethorpes 20th CD which should see noticeably improved sound.

Interest in Little Ann hasn't been so high for ten years or more, and it's all down to that man Gilly! (and Dave Hamilton of course)

Credit due to all concerned.......Awesome record!

Edited by wilxy

It only ever existed on a 1/4" tape and we had some problems getting a good sound out of it in the 90s, however technology and experience have moved on and we're doing a re-copy and EQ for the Cleethorpes 20th CD which should see noticeably improved sound.

Interest in Little Ann hasn't been so high for ten years or more, and it's all down to that man Gilly! (and Dave Hamilton of course)

Gilly is an amazing singer.

Listen to the instrumental,to me it in parts sounds very much like The Gallop M Wright see what you think ? Going to work now(booooo)

  • 5 years later...

Ady

Which one came out first who you trying to fool  KENT 112A  or 121B  I Believe the original to be the Kent 112A - As you can see i am divorced these days :)   

IMG_0446.JPG.eb1d3dc31c25df92c885d0a1c1529a88.JPG

(not Ady, obviously lol) but my copy is 112-A - this was released in 1999, the 121-B came out in 2003, so I'd say the 112-a is the first issue (not that it matters)

112 has "I got to have you" as the flip

Edited by Shufflin

Thank you for the confirmation, I agree that it is not too important but i only like to collect originals Sad i know ! Thank you

On 15/05/2017 at 13:27, shufflin said:

IMG_0446.JPG.eb1d3dc31c25df92c885d0a1c1529a88.JPG

(not Ady, obviously lol) but my copy is 112-A - this was released in 1999, the 121-B came out in 2003, so I'd say the 112-a is the first issue (not that it matters)

112 has "I got to have you" as the flip

Correct. The original is of course my self-made acetate but you ain't getting that. It's possible I made one for another DJ but I can't remember of course 

I have the Kent marked up a as a dj demo something like that on the red part of the kent label

R-4962144-1466517443-3813_jpeg.jpg

Not the same record mate.

28 minutes ago, James Hill said:

I have the Kent marked up a as a dj demo something like that on the red part of the kent label

R-4962144-1466517443-3813_jpeg.jpg

Not the same record mate.Who are you trying to fool.

Edited by Mick Reed

On 20 May 2017 at 11:34, ady croasdell said:

Correct. The original is of course my self-made acetate but you ain't getting that. It's possible I made one for another DJ but I can't remember of course 

You did one for Mr Searling

Andy

9 minutes ago, ady croasdell said:

I'll take your word for it Andy, thanks

You did him the alternate version with the funny guitar in the break ....  I don't think that version has ever been released ... Sound quality was a bit low-fi

Andy

Whatever you sent to Richard I imagine. It just turned up at mine one day [probably because the flip is funky]. There are no labels and the flip doesn't seem to have much of a chorus so can't really guess a title.

Get involved with Soul Source