Hitsville Chalky Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 please look at both labels , do you think this is the same 45. i won this on ebay in march, i paid through paypal , the seller says he sent this but it never arrived , the seller refunded my payment , and to be honsest i have won a few 45s from the seller in the past and never any problems, i noticed the seller as one on ebay right now, i emailed him stating this is the same 45 i won and paid for in march but he is saying its not the same 45, I've already asked pete smith and he agrees with me, what do you guys think -- IS IS THE SAME 45. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Chalky Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 It pretty much looks the same to these eyes Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Wilxy Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 please look at both labels , do you think this is the same 45. i won this on ebay in march, i paid through paypal , the seller says he sent this but it never arrived , the seller refunded my payment , and to be honsest i have won a few 45s from the seller in the past and never any problems, i noticed the seller as one on ebay right now, i emailed him stating this is the same 45 i won and paid for in march but he is saying its not the same 45, I've already asked pete smith and he agrees with me, what do you guys think -- IS IS THE SAME 45. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Wilxy Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Snap !!! Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Simsy Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Pity the scans don't blow up the same size. But almost certainly the same record imo. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Ritchieandrew Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Deffo looks the same record to me !!! Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Matchin`pair deffo`. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
pikeys dog Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 deffo the same - label damage around the middle in exactly the same place. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
soul45s Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Looks identical to me Who's the seller? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
pikeys dog Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Obviously didn't get as much as they wanted for it last time round so they welched on the deal. Name and shame the seller, then send them a link to this page. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Sean Hampsey Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 At least 6 aberrations (circled) that, after I enlarged the smaller image. prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are photographs of THE SAME 45! Sean Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Blake H Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 At least 6 aberrations (circled) that, after I enlarged the smaller image. prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are photographs of THE SAME 45! Sean Is your middle name Hercule by any chance?? Blake Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Girthdevon Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Is your middle name Hercule by any chance?? Blake He doesn't look strong enough Sorry.....i've got my coat. Girf Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
foolish fool Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 At least 6 aberrations (circled) that, after I enlarged the smaller image. prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are photographs of THE SAME 45! Sean Brilliant Sean, Just done the same on a old photo of my missus, left her this morning! Tats Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Rupert Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Brilliant Sean, Just done the same on a old photo of my missus, left her this morning! Tats thats very mean mr taylor Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest DELORENZO Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Couldn't do the same to my Mrs, my screen ain't big enough Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Kevinkent Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 please look at both labels , do you think this is the same 45. i won this on ebay in march, i paid through paypal , the seller says he sent this but it never arrived , the seller refunded my payment , and to be honsest i have won a few 45s from the seller in the past and never any problems, i noticed the seller as one on ebay right now, i emailed him stating this is the same 45 i won and paid for in march but he is saying its not the same 45, I've already asked pete smith and he agrees with me, what do you guys think -- IS IS THE SAME 45. Not quite my field, but I've given expert evidence in some of the highest profile criminal cases of recent years. I deal with fine visual detail of a different nature in cases of identity and have 26+ years of experience in this IMO either they are the same or one/both are boots and bearing an identical facsimile of the original label. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Mick Reed Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 please look at both labels , do you think this is the same 45. i won this on ebay in march, i paid through paypal , the seller says he sent this but it never arrived , the seller refunded my payment , and to be honsest i have won a few 45s from the seller in the past and never any problems, i noticed the seller as one on ebay right now, i emailed him stating this is the same 45 i won and paid for in march but he is saying its not the same 45, I've already asked pete smith and he agrees with me, what do you guys think -- IS IS THE SAME 45. identical twins Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
John Benson Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Or... It's a different record and the seller is just using the same picture. But you would have thought he'd have mentioned that if that was the case Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Hitsville Chalky Posted June 17, 2007 Author Share Posted June 17, 2007 (edited) Or... It's a different record and the seller is just using the same picture. But you would have thought he'd have mentioned that if that was the case Many Thanks to you guys. like i stated before I've brought loads of 45s form the guy and never ever been problems until now, I've even met him when i was in Detroit and he seemed a sound guy and i admit he as refunded me my payment. yes i do believe like pike's dog stated he may have wanted more for this , i won this for only $6 but really that's not the point, i do wonder if the seller has ever done this sort of thing before and when the buyer receives his money back end of story sort of thing but he as very good feedback. John when i emailed the seller he's reply was he found another in a Detroit basement and asked me to take a closer look at the label compared to mine what i won as one may have more wear on ,he never stated its the same pic what he used for mine only same sound file from soul club , as for comments and grading more or less the same only added a few more remarks on the latest and its the same grading VG 5. https://cgi.ebay.co.uk/FABULOUS-APOLLOS-Sup...VQQcmdZViewItem ps - the seller as quoted " If this one does not get any bids and you would like it as replacement in the meantime that is fine " Edited June 17, 2007 by hitsville chalky Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Kevinkent Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 (edited) Or... It's a different record and the seller is just using the same picture. But you would have thought he'd have mentioned that if that was the case Clearly NOT the same picture as the vinyl is at a different angle in each shot, and I have edited what followed as I realised I could be providing the seller with a reason for them appearing to be identical. Be careful folks, you don't know where this one is going to end up Edited June 17, 2007 by KevinKent Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Kevinkent Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Or... It's a different record and the seller is just using the same picture. But you would have thought he'd have mentioned that if that was the case Clearly NOT the same picture as the vinyl is at a different angle in each shot, and I have edited what followed as I realised I could be providing the seller with a reason for them appearing to be identical. Be careful folks, you don't know where this one is going to end up Cancel my last. Having viewed this on ebay I was amazed to notice the picture change as I viewed the screen! Never noticed this before - an apparent change of angle caused in someway by the image changing as though to widescreen. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts