- Replies 50
- Views 5.9k
- Created
- Last Reply
Most active in this topic
-
Woodbutcher 6 posts
-
Len 3 posts
-
Illusive 3 posts
-
Mickey Finn 3 posts
Most Popular Posts
-
Agreed the tune in question above is dreadful and should never have the label 'rare soul', but lets broaden it a bit. Why is the current trend, particularly on Ebay, for sellers to say 'Rare soul
-
Well said that man! How dare anyone even contemplate the possibility of matching the greatness of Doris Day
-
I think this loss of focus on 'is it good enough?', rather than lack of attendees is the biggest threat to the scene. Some of the stuff I hear (inc soul and RnB stuff) that gets lauded is pure sh
Seems to be more and more records listed these days with that old 'rare soul 45' title that are so lacking in any soulful content that they are frankly in breach of the 'trades descriptions act' ...
Yes we all tire of the same old , same old and are always wanting to hear something fresh and a little different , but when it comes in the form of some dreadful white 50's housewife doing a Doris Day impression then what in god's name do sellers hope to gain by describing something as a "Rare Soul 45" ... ???
Please for the love of doG stop trying to pass this sh*te off as soul music , it ain't soulful and never will be , even as an April's Fool gag this latest one would fall flat on it's face ...
Mini-rant over , time for a coffee methinks ...