Jump to content

O.v.o And C.r.&.p Venues


Steve G

Recommended Posts

From the website "Don't Forget The Motor City".......

There's A Ghost In My House (Brian Holland-Lamont Dozier-Edward Holland Jr-R. Dean Taylor) publ. Jobete

R. Dean Taylor; rec 26-Oct-66 ; produced by Brian Holland, Lamont Dozier

30-Mar-67; 45 (M): V.I.P. 25042 A

Oct-68; LP (M): Tamla Motown TML11077 Motown Memories Vol. 2 [ UK ]

09-Jul-01; CD (S): Spectrum 544 515 2 Essential Collection [ UK ]

25-May-07; CD (M): Hip O Select B0008993-02 The Complete Motown Singles Vol. 7 1967

Released on a 1968 UK Motown LP :no::D I wonder why did it take until 1970s to get "discovered" then :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Social source share

OK chaps/chapettes got a question for you all...................I think this has been done before on SS before as a separate thread but is very relevant to this thread imho-

How would a jock playing 'The Belles - Let me do it - Soul Fox' be viewed in the OVO debate? Would it qualify as say, playing a Grapevine 2000 unreleased track or carving an unreleased CD track would be?

Think there was some discussion of whether it was them and I think Kent reissued it on CD by someone else? (sorry forgot the details!)

'If' Mr Soul Fox 'legally' released this via the guy who owned the Mirwood masters would the playing of this brilliant 60's Northern dancer be allowed on the pink Soul Fox label :rolleyes:

Thoughts please?

Cheers

Steve

Wasn't Soul Fox a Soussan label.....?

Link to comment
Social source share

LOL, I hate to shoot you down Steve, but I've just realised that if there's any gaps in your knowledge then they're from this era which, as you quite rightly point out, was when you were a nipper. So since this is probably one of the few times I'll be able to contradict your good self by saying that in actual fact, R. Dean Taylor WAS a household name in the U.K. by the early 70's as he'd already had two Top 20 UK hits by 1971:-

Ian D :no:

Thanks, yes I do have these blind spots...I have the books at home but do most of this stuff not from home. :rolleyes:

Another blind spot was an uptempo dance record called "Find em fool em forget em" played on Radio 1 when I was in the 3rd / 4th year at school.

Link to comment
Social source share

Thanks, yes I do have these blind spots...I have the books at home but do most of this stuff not from home. :rolleyes:

Another blind spot was an uptempo dance record called "Find em fool em forget em" played on Radio 1 when I was in the 3rd / 4th year at school.

Either Dobie Gray or George Jackson, Steve... (Most probably Dobie's)

...but I guess you figured that out for yourself since leaving school :no:

Edited by Sean Hampsey
Link to comment
Social source share

Released on a 1968 UK Motown LP :no::D I wonder why did it take until 1970s to get "discovered" then :rolleyes:

LOL! I don't think so. I think it would have been found before 1972 in that case. I don't know that album and I suspect no one else does either. Would love to see a scan of the track listing as this is news to me. Anyone seen Tamla Motown TML11077 Motown Memories Vol. 2 [ UK ]?

It exists in the listings for sure but there's no track listing on my info.....

Ian D :lol:

Link to comment
Social source share

LOL! I don't think so. I think it would have been found before 1972 in that case. I don't know that album and I suspect no one else does either. Would love to see a scan of the track listing as this is news to me. Anyone seen Tamla Motown TML11077 Motown Memories Vol. 2 [ UK ]?

It exists in the listings for sure but there's no track listing on my info.....

Ian D :no:

one for sale here Ian :rolleyes:

https://www.vinylnet.co.uk/details.asp/id/1...s-Volume-2.html

Link to comment
Social source share

OK chaps/chapettes got a question for you all...................I think this has been done before on SS before as a separate thread but is very relevant to this thread imho-

How would a jock playing 'The Belles - Let me do it - Soul Fox' be viewed in the OVO debate? Would it qualify as say, playing a Grapevine 2000 unreleased track or carving an unreleased CD track would be?

Think there was some discussion of whether it was them and I think Kent reissued it on CD by someone else? (sorry forgot the details!)

'If' Mr Soul Fox 'legally' released this via the guy who owned the Mirwood masters would the playing of this brilliant 60's Northern dancer be allowed on the pink Soul Fox label :rolleyes:

Thoughts please?

Cheers

Steve

:no::D:lol:

Heaven forbid. The mind boggles LOL!

Very interesting question Steve.

Does the wily Soul Fox qualify on first release stuff? I don't know what else he did for the first time but I suspect there quite a few from the Mirwood vaults. "He's Alright With Me" - The Mirwood Strings would be another wouldn't it?

Ian D :(

Link to comment
Social source share

LOL! I don't think so. I think it would have been found before 1972 in that case. I don't know that album and I suspect no one else does either. Would love to see a scan of the track listing as this is news to me. Anyone seen Tamla Motown TML11077 Motown Memories Vol. 2 [ UK ]?

It exists in the listings for sure but there's no track listing on my info.....

Ian D :no:

If you google it Ian there seem to be copies for sale :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Social source share

Still no track listing though. I'm sure the album exists but I'd be stunned if TAGIMH was on it and we all missed it. SOMEONE would have caught that track surely......?

Ian D :rolleyes:

lastly the tracklisting for you.....

11077. Motown Memories. Vol.2

=============================

01 - Barret Strong - Money (That's What I Want)

02 - Marvelettes - Beechwood 4-5789

03 - Shorty Long - Devil With The Blue Dress On

04 - Kim Weston - It Should Have Been Me

05 - Eddie Holland - Take A Chance On Me

06 - Barbara McNair - You're Gonna Love My Baby

07 - R Dean Taylor - There's A Ghost In My House

08 - Carolyn Crawford - My Smile Is Just A Frown (Turned Upside Down)

09 - Stevie Wonder - Fingertips

10 - Mary Wells - When I'm Gone

11 - Martha & Vandellas - Darling I Hum Our Song

12 - Miracles - I'll Try Something New

13 - Supremes - Standing At The Crossroads Of Love

14 - Choker Campbell - Come See About Me

15 - Brenda Holloway - I'll Always Love You

16 - Monitors - Greetings (This Is Uncle Sam)

Link to comment
Social source share

scan of back and front :rolleyes:

post-225-1222260600_thumb.jpgpost-225-1222260609_thumb.jpg

Wow. I'm stunned. How about that. Never seen one of them in my life. It's not one of those Dutch-only Tamla Motown pressings or something is it? I would have thought that someone would have had that album between 1968-72 'cos it's packed with Northern and plenty of rare tracks. It certainly slipped through my net that's for sure. But EVERYONE'S net........?

It's not a wind-up is it?

Ian D :no:

Link to comment
Social source share


Wow. I'm stunned. How about that. Never seen one of them in my life. It's not one of those Dutch-only Tamla Motown pressings or something is it? I would have thought that someone would have had that album between 1968-72 'cos it's packed with Northern and plenty of rare tracks. It certainly slipped through my net that's for sure. But EVERYONE'S net........?

It's not a wind-up is it?

Ian D :no:

Now would I wind you up Ian :rolleyes:

No it's definitely not a wind up and definitely UK.

Link to comment
Social source share

Wow. I'm stunned. How about that. Never seen one of them in my life. It's not one of those Dutch-only Tamla Motown pressings or something is it? I would have thought that someone would have had that album between 1968-72 'cos it's packed with Northern and plenty of rare tracks. It certainly slipped through my net that's for sure. But EVERYONE'S net........?

It's not a wind-up is it?

Ian D :no:

MR D IVE GOT THIS UK LP :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Social source share

Now would I wind you up Ian :rolleyes:

No it's definitely not a wind up and definitely UK.

Wow.

What can I say guys? Apart from the fact that Motown LP's were a lot less collectible back then and maybe didn't get the same kind of scrutiny that they would these days.

But that's no excuse really. We were a bunch of twats who wouldn't know our R. Dean Taylor 1968 compilation album tracks from our elbows! :no:

Ian D :D

Link to comment
Social source share

:rolleyes::no::D

Heaven forbid. The mind boggles LOL!

Very interesting question Steve.

Does the wily Soul Fox qualify on first release stuff? I don't know what else he did for the first time but I suspect there quite a few from the Mirwood vaults. "He's Alright With Me" - The Mirwood Strings would be another wouldn't it?

Ian D :(

Hi Ian

yes, what i was getting at was that 'if' The Belles was 'legal' could it be played out?......and if so what OVO DJ would play a pink label Soul Fox 45 in his set :lol:

I think Ady/Kent got to the bottom of the legalities of this.........anyone find the original link?

Either way it's a fooking brilliant Northern dancer imho and one of the top bods could make it monstrous I reckon, cos at the time I don't think it went as big as it could have done (probably cos of the Soul Fox connection?) t'other side from Jackie Lee's a belter too!

Cheers

Steve

Edited by Steve Plumb
Link to comment
Social source share

LOL! I don't think so. I think it would have been found before 1972 in that case. I don't know that album and I suspect no one else does either. Would love to see a scan of the track listing as this is news to me. Anyone seen Tamla Motown TML11077 Motown Memories Vol. 2 [ UK ]?

It exists in the listings for sure but there's no track listing on my info.....

Ian D :ohmy:

I purchased this and Motown Memories vol 1 for about a quid each brand new from a shop in Scunthorpe about 1970.

I was always playing Ghost In My House and You're Gonna Love My Baby at our local youth club, but not on dance nights owing to more common Motown stuff being played.

Still got these LP's along with Breakout-Mitch Ryder,Rare Stamps-Barnes and Mancha and The Fabulous Impressions also purchased from there along with Uptight where the opening track Love A Go Go was very popular at that time and not on a single as far as I know but I am sure I could be corrected!

Steve

Link to comment
Social source share

Ah but there are different reasons for a company to reissue a 45. In some cases like say The Magic Touch, it's to satisfy demand, in others like the recent Millie Jacksons it's to make LP tracks available on 45 and in others like Luther Ingram or Danny Cobus it's to get a previously unissued track onto vinyl so DJs other than the ones who have had the exclusive acetates can play it out and popularise the music more, thereby upping demand for the recording and getting artists, writers (and us) more income. In the case of the 100 Club anniversary singles it is promotional for the forthcoming CD and a thank you and a memento for the customers who take the trouble to support our venue and label. Invariably the buzz from being on a collectible anniversary vinyl 45 improves sales in the long run on CD and sometimes reissued vinyl.

yes Ady, you are right about that. I agree.

marc

Edited by Marc Forrest
Link to comment
Social source share

Don't know if anyone has said this but the version of Ghost In My House on the MFP album is totally different to the single - the single starts off with the guitar intro, the album track does not have the guitar intro and begins with the words "Theres a ghost in my house", totally different recording

Link to comment
Social source share

OK Ian, something YOU have learnt today as well. Ha ha....

..................anyway back to OV etc - anyone else got anything to say on that subject? Or are we done?

Yes I have and Iv'e not read all 54 pages so here goes. Do you mean OVO as the OVO on the LOCAL LABELS or OVO being the ones realeased by the larger companies that picked them up later? As I said haven't read all pages so if it's been said earlier then Yes we are all done.

Chris

Edited by bridget
Link to comment
Social source share

Yes I have and Iv'e not read all 54 pages so here goes. Do you mean OVO as the OVO on the LOCAL LABELS or OVO being the ones realeased by the larger companies that picked them up later?

Chris

Both. So I'd play the Ivorys on Wand rather than Despanzo, but both are fine in my book.

Link to comment
Social source share

Yes I have and Iv'e not read all 54 pages so here goes. Do you mean OVO as the OVO on the LOCAL LABELS or OVO being the ones realeased by the larger companies that picked them up later? As I said haven't read all pages so if it's been said earlier then Yes we are all done.

Chris

Good question.

We need a definition!

:ohmy:

Does "Original Vinyl Only" mean..

1. 'We only play records on vinyl as they originally appeared' (Ann Sexton on Impel) (David Sea on Hy-Tide)

2. 'We also play records on vinyl as they may have appeared later... but they are legit' (Ann Sexton on 77) (David Sea on T-Jaye)

3. 'We only play records on vinyl as they originally appeared... in whatever country' (Baltimore & Ohio Marching Band "Condition Red" Oz Stateside) :lol:

4. 'We only play records on vinyl... and are quite prepared to play records that have never legitimately appeared on vinyl... as long as we play them on vinyl that we've had 'done' for us'

:)

Sean

Link to comment
Social source share

Good question.

We need a definition!

:ohmy:

Does "Original Vinyl Only" mean..

1. 'We only play records on vinyl as they originally appeared' (Ann Sexton on Impel) (David Sea on Hy-Tide)

2. 'We also play records on vinyl as they may have appeared later... but they are legit' (Ann Sexton on 77) (David Sea on T-Jaye)

3. 'We only play records on vinyl as they originally appeared... in whatever country' (Baltimore & Ohio Marching Band "Condition Red" Oz Stateside) biggrin.gif

4. 'We only play records on vinyl... and are quite prepared to play records that have never legitimately appeared on vinyl... as long as we play them on vinyl that we've had 'done' for us'

:lol:

Sean

These four all seem fair and would legitimately fall into the definition of OV.

Maybe with the benefit of 22 pages hbeinsight it would be a lot simpler if we just said venues / DJS that played bootlegs, but that doesn't sound as good as CR&P :)

Link to comment
Social source share


But isn't this thread about OV, and does the copy of the Ivory's on Wand constitute a re=issue. Seems to me you can't have it both ways, it's either the original or not.

No I think that's just too anal to be realistic. I mean there might have been 3 weeks difference between the local release and the national release. Either is fine for me. The national releases are bona fide originals in my book.

Link to comment
Social source share

OK Ian, something YOU have learnt today as well. Ha ha....

..................anyway back to OV etc - anyone else got anything to say on that subject? Or are we done?

Yep. It never fails to amaze me this scene. You're never too old to learn....and never too young to fall in love.

I think I'm done now. Good thread!

Ian D :ohmy:

Link to comment
Social source share

Of course the wand 45 is an original. Just because it's on a local issue before being picked up for national distribution has nothing to do with originality - Its simple economics. 'Dave Despenza' didnt have the brass to distribute all over the country so hawk it to the nationals. The timelines on some would have been ver short in some cases I would have thought.

Rich

Link to comment
Social source share

Don't know if anyone has said this but the version of Ghost In My House on the MFP album is totally different to the single - the single starts off with the guitar intro, the album track does not have the guitar intro and begins with the words "Theres a ghost in my house", totally different recording

Well something else I never knew. There's now 2 different recordings of TAGIMH then? How weird.....

Ian D :ohmy:

Link to comment
Social source share

Of course the wand 45 is an original. Just because it's on a local issue before being picked up for national distribution has nothing to do with originality - Its simple economics. 'Dave Despenza' didnt have the brass to distribute all over the country so hawk it to the nationals. The timelines on some would have been ver short in some cases I would have thought.

Rich

With respect that is what makes the whole of this thread pointless. the Wand issue is NOT the original. I wonder which one T. Brown has in his collection. Just because a company with clout picks up a tune does not make it the original. In my opinion this legitamizes the playing of re-issues as I suspect after looking at J.Manships 'Rarest of the Rare that many a treasured 'Original' is in fact a re-issue, but maybe just maybe we don't want to acknowledge that. Oh my I'm becoming an anorak.

Chris

Edited by bridget
Link to comment
Social source share

With respect that is what makes the whole of this thread pointless. the Wand issue is NOT the original. I wonder which one T. Brown has in his collection. Just because a company with clout picks up a tune does not make it the original. In my opinion this legitamizes the playing of re-issues as I suspect after looking at J.Manships 'Rarest of the Rare that many a treasured 'Original' is in fact a re-issue, but maybe just maybe we don't want to acknowledge that. Oh my I'm becoming an anorak.

Chris

The Wand issue is however original vinyl. Might not be the first issue but it's still original vinyl.

Might be easier if we called it "Authentic vinyl" and "Bootlegs"? Then we could have probably got a conclusion far quicker.

Link to comment
Social source share

I'll update it at some point, and then unless there are any other nuggets, move onto my next thread........DJs that only play OV :ohmy::)

Hah!

That'll be pretty much the same list as I was thinking about doing...

'DJ's / Venues that are more interested in showing off Collectors pieces than in Music'

I'll give it a miss though if you're doing it!

:lol:

Sean

Link to comment
Social source share

But isn't this thread about OV, and does the copy of the Ivory's on Wand constitute a re=issue. Seems to me you can't have it both ways, it's either the original or not.

No I think that's just too anal to be realistic. I mean there might have been 3 weeks difference between the local release and the national release. Either is fine for me. The national releases are bona fide originals in my book.

Hmm, perhaps in this case another term may be more appropriate...contemporaneous perhaps?

Link to comment
Social source share

Guest gordon russell

Don't know if anyone has said this but the version of Ghost In My House on the MFP album is totally different to the single - the single starts off with the guitar intro, the album track does not have the guitar intro and begins with the words "Theres a ghost in my house", totally different recording

is it just as bad pete or worse or about the same level of crapness lol :thumbsup::lol:

Link to comment
Social source share

The Wand issue is however original vinyl. Might not be the first issue but it's still original vinyl.

Might be easier if we called it "Authentic vinyl" and "Bootlegs"? Then we could have probably got a conclusion far quicker.

So from now on I'll play whatever i want and when some clever clogs comes up and asks if it's on the OV I'll respond by asking him if he has a copy of the AV, if he/she say yes I will bow to their superior collection and give my spot over to then cause THEY ARE the real originals :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Social source share

So from now on I'll play whatever i want and when some clever clogs comes up and asks if it's on the OV I'll respond by asking him if he has a copy of the AV, if he/she say yes I will bow to their superior collection and give my spot over to then cause THEY ARE the real originals :thumbsup:

Straight question - do you play bootlegs?

Link to comment
Social source share

With respect that is what makes the whole of this thread pointless. the Wand issue is NOT the original. I wonder which one T. Brown has in his collection. Just because a company with clout picks up a tune does not make it the original. In my opinion this legitamizes the playing of re-issues as I suspect after looking at J.Manships 'Rarest of the Rare that many a treasured 'Original' is in fact a re-issue, but maybe just maybe we don't want to acknowledge that. Oh my I'm becoming an anorak.

Chris

Calling the national copy a re-issue would imply the local copy is out of print which may or may not be the case. The important words here are local and national - And far from wanting to lambast or penalise 'Dave Despenza' for not having enough money or clout to promote and distribute his work across the united states makes the playing of both copies acceptable to the collector / dj IMO

I accept there are collectors out there who may agree with you - Someone recently mentioned they would prefer the west coast dist. version as opposed to the east coast which he considered not the first press. IMVHO that is utter sh**e - Economics / Promotion etc etc play a part in a records life and success/failure. Dont forget a lot of these local 45s labels had meagre budgets to start with.

Rich

Link to comment
Social source share

Get involved with Soul Source

Add your comments now

Join Soul Source

A free & easy soul music affair!

Join Soul Source now!

Log in to Soul Source

Jump right back in!

Log in now!


×
×
  • Create New...